body

dirt

At a glance

אלחelach
tainted, sullied
an incompatible admixture spoils a uniform substance (Pappenheim)
לכלוךlichluch
grime
wet grime, no chatzitzah (Mikvaos 9:4); misplaced, not disgusting (Pappenheim)
טינוףtinuf
soiling
soiling by what is merely misplaced, ketchup on a shirt (Pappenheim)
גועלgo'al
defilement, befouling
defiled by the inherently disgusting, blood or excrement (Pappenheim)
זוהמהzuhamah
filth
clinging residue that usually smells (Donash Ibn Labrat); foul sweat (Radak)

In short

Go'al is dirtying by something inherently disgusting, such as blood, excrement or forbidden food: defilement, befouling. Tinuf and lichluch are dirtying by something not necessarily disgusting in itself but unwanted where it landed (Rabbi Shlomo Pappenheim): soiling and grime, with lichluch wet in its one mishnaic use (Mikvaos 9:4). Zuhamah is the unwanted residue that clings and usually smells: filth. Elach is the spoiling of something homogeneous by an incompatible admixture: tainted, sullied. On Pappenheim's account, then, the difference lies in the dirtying agent: whether it is disgusting in itself (go'al), merely misplaced (tinuf, lichluch), or a foreign element mixed in (elach). The distinctions are not agreed, though. Rabbi Tanchum HaYerushalmi writes fairly clearly, in at least two places, that tinuf, lichluch and zuhamah are all synonymous, and Pappenheim too seems to equate lichluch with tinuf, as do Ibn Janach and Radak.

Distinctions

Elach (אלח)

Root א-ל-ח; three occurrences in Tanach (Iyov 15:16, Tehillim 14:3, 53:4).

  • Rabbi Shlomo Pappenheim: not soiling by something disgusting, but the ruin that comes when something of another type is mixed into an otherwise uniform substance (grape juice poured into milk is now undrinkable, and only because the combination is incompatible). Pappenheim takes the initial aleph as extraneous and the working root as the two-letter ל-ח, "liquid" (as in davar lach), so elach is an unwanted liquid sullying something else.
  • The classical lexicographers, among them Menachem Ibn Saruk, Yonah Ibn Janach and Radak, trace the term to the full triliteral root א-ל-ח.
  • Rav Hirsch (to Tehillim 14:3) links it to א-ל-ה, which yields allah, "curse," through the interchange of hei and ches: both name a clash in which one party is set against the other.

Lichluch (לכלוך)

Post-biblical; absent from Tanach, once in the Mishnah, then the standard word for dirtiness in the Gemara and later. Dr. Alexander Kohut (HeAruch HaShaleim) sees lichluch, with a kaf, as synonymous with its near-homonym lichluach, with a ches, which means wet or liquid and derives from the biblical two-letter ל-ח. That biblical root, Rabbi Klein suggests, might just be the root of lichluch as well. That fits its one mishnaic use: lichluch of wet feces on the skin is no chatzitzah for immersion (Mikvaos 9:4), since the wet grime merges with the mikvah water, while the same matter dried would interpose. Rashi uses lichluch to describe the spiritual grime of forbidden food (to Daniel 1:8). The Gemara's anecdote in Nedarim 66b turns on a woman named Lichluchis, "dirty," and Rabbi Yishmael ben Rabbi Yose's ruling that the name fits.

Tinuf (טינוף)

Root ט-נ-ף, once in Tanach: "I have washed my feet, how shall I dirty them" (Shir HaShirim 5:3). Three mishnaic uses: tinofes, spoiled produce tolerated up to a twenty-fourth in a wholesale purchase (Bava Basra 6:2); uterine blood that has tinuf (Bechoros 3:1); feet dirtied in a cave pool (Machshirin 4:5). Tinuf also serves in the Targumim as the Aramaic rendering of the biblical tinuf (Shir HaShirim 5:3), of go'al (Eichah 4:14) and of elach (Tehillim 14:3, 53:4), though some versions of the Targum to Tehillim 14:3 use a different word.

Pappenheim writes that all the words under discussion refer to something unwanted becoming attached to an object in such a way that the object is now "disgusting" or "disgraced," so that a person is disinclined to use it. Within that, he holds that with tinuf, as with lichluch, the dirtying agent is not necessarily repulsive in itself; ketchup is desirable as food until it lands on a shirt. So too the lover of Shir HaShirim: the dirt on the floor may not be undesirable in itself, but clinging to her newly washed feet it makes them feel dirty. In a separate discussion Pappenheim derives tinuf from the biblical two-letter root ט-ף. Machberes Menachem lists four categories of words as coming from that root: taf, children; notef/tipah, dripping; netifos, adornments and niceties; and matif, speech or preaching. Pappenheim gives the core sense of the root as "secondary, subordinate," and reads tinuf accordingly: the dirtying element is secondary to the object it clings to.

Shadal (to Bamidbar 35:33) points out that both Rabbi Shlomo Ibn Parchon and Wilhelm Gesenius explained chonef, often translated flattery or hypocrisy, as related to tinuf, both naming something polluting or defiling, one in a moral sense and one in a physical one. Rabbi Klein adds that the philological basis for the connection is presumably the interchangeability of ches and tes, which are consecutive letters.

Go'al (גועל)

Thirteen occurrences in Tanach, on Even-Shoshan's concordance.

  • Pappenheim: dirtied by a pollutant that is disgusting in its own right, excrement (Tzefaniah 3:1), blood (Yeshayahu 59:3, Eichah 4:14). Daniel refused to defile himself (yisga'al) with the king's food (Daniel 1:8); Hashem's garments are befouled (ega'alti) with Edom's blood (Yeshayahu 63:3).
  • Rabbi Yehoshua Steinberg ties it to geulah and go'el under ג-(א)-ל: a single axis of nearness and distance, with go'al naming what one distances oneself from and redemption naming the drawing near; he also links ג-ע-ל, "repugnant," through the interchange of aleph and ayin.
  • Pappenheim, taking a slightly different approach, ties it to the two-letter ג-ל, "round," through galal, the typically round pellets of animal droppings that no one disputes are filth.

Zuhamah (זוהמה)

Root ז-ה-ם, once in Tanach: to the sick man food looks like zuhamah (Iyov 33:20).

  • Radak (Sefer HaShorashim): the foul sweat a body gives off, or the residue thrown off in preparing certain foods.
  • Pappenheim reduces it to the single letter zayin, "movement," and reads it as the fluid that oozes out after an unhealthy build-up, hence anything excess and unwanted.
  • Donash Ibn Labrat: zuhamah is specifically the bad smell of something dirty, while tinuf is plain soiling; an Arabic cognate, zahuma, likewise refers to something dirty or smelly.
  • Rav Hirsch (to Tehillim 7:12) relates ז-ה-ם to ז-ע-ם, za'am, anger or curse: both name a thing rejected by the beholder.

In the Mishnah it covers a blemished, foul-smelling animal (Bechoros 6:12), fish odor removed by an onion (Terumos 10:1), and treating saplings before shevi'is (Shevi'is 2:4; manure per Rabbi Shimon of Shantz, foul-smelling oil to repel insects per Rambam; see also Rabbi Tzemach Duran's responsa Yachin U'Boaz I §114). The Gemara: one should use cold water for mayim acharonim, because hot water is less effective at removing the zuhamah from the hands (Chullin 105a), and one who is mezuham may not recite a berachah just as a mezuham Kohen may not serve (Berachos 53b), a halachah taught by Rabbi Zuhamai, so named for it (Rabbi Yaakov Emden there, who also notes the name Zaham of Divrei HaYamim II 11:19, which seems to be of the same root). Pseudo-Rashbam (to Tehillim 26:10) glosses zimah as tinuf, from which Rabbi Steinberg suggests he read ז-מ-ה as a metathesis of ז-ה-ם. In Modern Hebrew mezuham means "infected" in the bacterial sense.

  • In at least two places in HaMadrich HaMaspik, Rabbi Tanchum HaYerushalmi (a thirteenth-century exegete who lived in Eretz Yisrael) writes fairly clearly that tinuf, lichluch and zuhamah are all synonymous.
  • Pappenheim too seems to equate lichluch with tinuf, as do Ibn Janach and Radak in their respective Sifrei HaShorashim.
  • Rabbi Klein suggests that where they are equated the difference may be etymological rather than semantic, and offers two ways to argue it: tinuf seems to be actual biblical Hebrew while lichluch seems to be a later Aramaic borrowing; or, alternatively, lichluch may derive from biblical ל-ח while tinuf is the loanword that came in from Aramaic, on the evidence that the Targumim favor it.
  • Rabbi Shaul Goldman sums up what he sees as the differences in rabbinic usage: tinuf usually for contamination by bodily fluids or contact with animals, lichluch usually implying unwanted wetness or moisture, zuhamah pointing to some unwanted element, usually a contaminant.

Also discussed in

  • Angerזעם / zaam (ז-ע-מ), with זוהמה / zuhamah
  • Curseאלה / אלח (א-ל-ה)

Radak on these roots

Sefer HaShorashim

א-ל-ח

To stink; the word is the letters of חֶלְאָתָה, the scum in a pot, turned about.

Stinking

אַף כִּֽי־נִתְעָב וְֽנֶאֱלָח (Iyov 15:16), all the more one abhorrent and stinking, and יַחְדָּו נֶאֱלָחוּ (Tehillim 14:3), together they have come to stink. Radak gives the sense of both as נבאש, stinking.

The letters reversed

Radak holds the word a transposition of the letters in סִיר אֲשֶׁר חֶלְאָתָה בָהּ (Yechezkel 24:6), a pot whose scum is in it.

אַף כִּֽי־נִתְעָב וְֽנֶאֱלָח (איוב טו, טו), יַחְדָּו נֶאֱלָחוּ (תהלים יד, ג), ענינם נבאש, והוא הפוך מן סִיר אֲשֶׁר חֶלְאָתָה בָהּ (יחזקאל כד, ו).

ג-א-ל

To redeem, the near kinsman being called גואל because the right of redemption is his; and a second sense, of filth and soiling, to defile and be defiled.

Redeeming

גְּאַל ־לְךָ אַתָּה אֶת־גְּאֻלָּתִי (Rus 4:6), redeem for yourself my right of redemption; וּבָא גֹֽאֲלוֹ הַקָּרֹב אֵלָיו (Vayikra 25:25), and his redeemer who is near to him shall come; and מִֽגֹּֽאֲלֵנוּ הֽוּא (Rus 2:20), he is one of our redeeming kinsmen: because the right of redemption belongs to the near relative, he is called גואל. Hashem redeeming His servant Yaakov is the same verb at Yeshayahu 48:20.

Being redeemed, and the noun

אֽוֹ־הִשִּׂיגָה יָדוֹ וְנִגְאָֽל (Vayikra 25:49), or if his means suffice, he is redeemed; וְאִם־לֹא יִגָּאֵל בְּאֵלֶּה (Vayikra 25:54), and if he is not redeemed by these; and the noun וּלְךָ הַגְּאֻלָּה (Yirmiyahu 32:8), and the right of redemption is yours.

Buying from a Levi, or redeeming

Some explain וַֽאֲשֶׁר יִגְאַל מִן־הַֽלְוִיִּם (Vayikra 25:33) as אשר יקנה, what one buys from the Leviim; that is, if a man buys a house in a walled city from the Leviim, it is not made his outright after a year as one bought from an Israel would be, but goes out at the yovel if he did not redeem it. It may also be read as redemption, since the pasuk says גְּאֻלַּת עוֹלָם תִּהְיֶה לַֽלְוִיִּֽם (Vayikra 25:32), the Leviim shall have a perpetual right of redemption. One might have thought the pasuk speaks only of an Israel who took from a Levi, so that a Levi may redeem forever but a Levi who took from a Levi could not; therefore it says that a Levi redeems from the hand of a Levi with a perpetual redemption, and if he did not redeem it, the sale of the house and of the city of his holding goes out at the yovel.

Defiled

Another sense: הוֹי מֹֽרְאָה וְנִגְאָלָה (Tzefaniah 3:1), woe to her that is filthy and defiled; בַּמֶּה גֵֽאַלְנוּךָ (Malachi 1:7), wherein have we defiled You, and in that same pasuk לֶחֶם מְגֹאָל, defiled bread; וַיְגֹֽאֲלוּ מִן־הַכְּהֻנָּֽה (Nechemiah 7:64), and they were put out of the priesthood as defiled; נְגֹֽאֲלוּ בַדָּם (Yeshayahu 59:3), they are defiled with blood; גָּֽאֳלֵי הַכְּהֻנָּה (Nechemiah 13:29), those who defiled the priesthood; and אֲשֶׁר לֹֽא־ יִתְגָּאַל בְּפַת־בַּג הַמֶּלֶךְ (Daniel 1:8), that he would not defile himself with the king's food. All of them are a matter of filth and befouling.

Other readings of two pesukim

יִגְאָלֻהוּ חשֶׁךְ וְצַלְמָוֶת (Iyov 3:5), in the sense of filth, means, let darkness and the shadow of death defile it. Some read it from מִֽגֹּֽאֲלֵנוּ הֽוּא (Rus 2:20), he is one of our kinsmen; that is, let darkness and the shadow of death be its near kin. And some read וַיְגֹֽאֲלוּ מִן־הַכְּהֻנָּֽה (Nechemiah 7:64) from that sense of kinship turned to its opposite, as מַשְׁרִישׁ, taking root, stands against מִשָׁרֵשׁ, uprooting: a גואל is the near kinsman and a מגאל one put far from kinship and family, and these were put far from the priesthood because they did not find their record of lineage.

A stained garment

וְכָל־מַלְבּוּשַׁי אֶגְאָֽלְתִּי (Yeshayahu 63:3), and I have stained all my raiment, whose proper form is הִגְאָלְתִּי, the alef standing in place of the hei of the form.

גָּאַל י"י עַבְדּוֹ יַֽעֲקֹֽב (ישעיה מח, כ), גְּאַל־לְךָ אַתָּה אֶת־גְּאֻלָּתִי (רות ד, ו), וּבָא גֹֽאֲלוֹ הַקָּרֹב אֵלָיו (ויקרא כה, כה), מִֽגֹּֽאֲלֵנוּ הֽוּא (רות ב, כ), לפי שלקרוב משפט הגאולה נקרא גואל. והנפעל אֽוֹ־הִשִּׂיגָה יָדוֹ וְנִגְאָֽל (ויקרא כה, מט), וְאִם־לֹא יִגָּאֵל בְּאֵלֶּה (ויקרא כה, נד). והשם וּלְךָ הַגְּאֻלָּה (ירמיה לב, ח). ויש מפרשים וַֽאֲשֶׁר יִגְאַל מִן־הַֽלְוִיִּם (ויקרא כה, לג), אשר יקנה, כלומר אם יקנה אדם מהלוים בית עיר חומה לא יחלט לשנה כמו מישראל אלא יצא ביובל אם לא גאלו בבתים. ויש לפרשו לשון גאולה, לפי שאמר גְּאֻלַּת עוֹלָם תִּהְיֶה לַֽלְוִיִּֽם (ויקרא כה, לב), יכול לא דבר הכתוב אלא בישראל שלקח מיד לוי שיש ללוי לגאול לעולם אבל לוי שלקח מלוי לא יגאל לעולם לפיכך אמר וַֽאֲשֶׁר יִגְאַל מִן־הַֽלְוִיִּם כלומר לוי גואל מיד לוי גאלת עולם ואם לא גאלו ויצא ממכר בית ועיר אחוזתו ביובל. וענין אחר הוֹי מֹֽרְאָה וְנִגְאָלָה (צפניה ג, א), מלרע והוא נפעל עומד. ופועל הכבד [פִּעֵל] בַּמֶּה גֵֽאַלְנוּךָ (מלאכי א, ז), לֶחֶם מְגֹאָל (שם). ושלא נזכר פועלו [פֻּעַל] וַיְגֹֽאֲלוּ מִן־הַכְּהֻנָּֽה (נחמיה ז, סד), והמורכב ממנו עם הנפעל נְגֹֽאֲלוּ בַדָּם (ישעיה נט, ג), והתאר גָּֽאֳלֵי הַכְּהֻנָּה (נחמיה יג, כט), בפלס תָּאֳמֵי צְבִיָּֽה (שיר השירים ז, ד), וההתפעל אֲשֶׁר לֹֽא־יִתְגָּאַל בְּפַת־בַּג הַמֶּלֶךְ (דניאל א, ח). וכבד אחר [הִפְעִיל] וְכָל־מַלְבּוּשַׁי אֶגְאָֽלְתִּי (ישעיה סג, ג), משפטו הִגְאָלְתִּי האל"ף תמורת ה"א הבנין. והפעל הקל מזה הענין יִגְאָלֻהוּ חשֶׁךְ וְצַלְמָוֶת (איוב ג, ה), כלם ענין טנוף ולכלוך. ויש מפרשים יִגְאָלֻהוּ חשֶׁךְ וְצַלְמָוֶת מענין מִֽגֹּֽאֲלֵנוּ הֽוּא (רות ב, כ), כלומר יהיו קרוביו החשך והצלמות. ויש מפרשים מזה וַיְגֹֽאֲלוּ מִן־הַכְּהֻנָּֽה (נחמיה ז, סד), גאלה הכהנה, והוא הפך הענין כמו מַשְׁרִישׁ וּמִשָׁרֵשׁ כן גּוֹאֵל הוא הקרוב וּמִגֹאֵל הוא שנתרחק מן הקרבה והמשפחה והם נתרחקו שלא מצאו כתב היחש.

ז-ה-ם

Filth, זוהמא, the loathsome sweat of a man's body or of food, as when a man's soul reckons his bread filth; Chazal use the word of food and of the body.

The one pasuk

וְזִהֲמַתּוּ חַיָּתוֹ לָחֶם (Iyov 33:20), his soul makes bread filth to him: that is, his soul reckons the food as zuhama, filth.

What the filth is

The zuhama is הזיעה המאוסה, the loathsome sweat, whether it comes off a man's body or off the food.

The word in Chazal, of food

Chazal use it of food, להעביר הזהומה, to take off the filth (Chullin 105a), and בידים מזהמות, with filthy hands (Berachos 47b).

The word in Chazal, of the body

Of the body, ישֹראל שעמדו על הר סיני פסקה זוהמתן (Avodah Zarah 22b), of Yisrael who stood at Har Sinai, that their filth ceased.

וְזִֽהֲמַתּוּ חַיָּתוֹ לָחֶם (איוב לג, כ), פירוש תחשוב נפשו המאכל לזוהמא והוא הזיעה המאוסה בין מגוף האדם בין ממאבל. ודומה לו בלשון רבותינו על ענין המאכל (חולין קה, ע"א) להעביר הזהומה, בידים מזהמות (ברכות מז, ע"ב). ועל ענין הגוף ישֹראל שעמדו על הר סיני פסקה זוהמתן (עבודה זרה כב, ע"ב).

ט-נ-ף

To soil, to dirty: אֲטַנְּפֵם is אלכלכם, I shall dirty them. Chazal use the word of dirt, as in the filthy alleyways, and there are many more.

Soiling

אֵיכָכָה אֲטַנְּפֵֽם (Shir HaShirim 5:3), how shall I soil them. Radak glosses it אלכלכם, I shall dirty them.

Chazal's use

Chazal speak of dirt in this word, במבואות המטונפות, in the filthy alleyways (Berachos 24b). Radak adds that there are many more like it.

אֵיכָכָה אֲטַנְּפֵֽם (שיר השירים ה, ג), אלכלכם. ובדברי רבותינו ז"ל בענין לכלוך בזה הלשון באמרם (ברכות כד, ע"ב), במבואות המטונפות. וזולת זה רבים.

Radak, Sefer HaShorashim, Berlin 1847. Public domain, digitised by Sefaria from the National Library of Israel.

Sources

Rabbi Reuven Chaim Klein, "Shavuos: Getting Dirty," What's in a Word?, Ohr Somayach, 8 June 2024.

Cited in the essay: Iyov 15:16, 33:20; Tehillim 14:3, 53:4, 7:12, 26:10; Shir HaShirim 5:3; Daniel 1:8; Yeshayahu 59:3, 63:3; Eichah 4:14; Tzefaniah 3:1; Divrei HaYamim II 11:19; Bamidbar 35:33; Mishnah Mikvaos 9:4, Bava Basra 6:2, Bechoros 3:1 and 6:12, Machshirin 4:5, Terumos 10:1, Shevi'is 2:4; Shabbos 146a, Yevamos 103b, Avodah Zarah 26b, Nedarim 66b, Chullin 105a, Berachos 53b; Radak, Sefer HaShorashim; Rabbi Tanchum HaYerushalmi, HaMadrich HaMaspik; Rabbi Tzemach Duran, Yachin U'Boaz I §114; Machberes Menachem; Alexander Kohut, Aruch HaShalem; Even-Shoshan's concordance; Wilhelm Gesenius and Rabbi Shlomo Ibn Parchon, per Shadal to Bamidbar 35:33; the Arabic cognate zahuma.