nature
beast and boor
בעיר · בהמה · חיה · בער · בור
Bottom line
Behemah is the ordinary word for a domesticated animal; chayah a wild animal; be'ir a rare word for a beast, and for Rav Hirsch the most subdued of the three, doing nothing but what instinct drives it to. The same root gives ba'ar, the brute or boor, and the Mishnaic bur, the uncultured man. When a pasuk pairs ba'ar with behemah (Tehillim 73:22) the pairing is the point; keep the two English words distinct.
At a glance
| Hebrew | translit | English | what sets it apart |
|---|---|---|---|
| בעיר | be'ir | beast, livestock | wholly subdued, instinct-driven; cognate with ba'ar (Rav Hirsch) |
| בהמה | behemah | domesticated animal | the standard term; a platform for man's elevation (Rav Hirsch) |
| חיה | chayah | wild animal | independent life, not subservient to man (Rav Hirsch) |
| בער | ba'ar | brute, boor | sub-human for want of intelligence, like a be'ir (Edel, Malbim) |
| בור | bur | uncultured man | uncultivated field (Rashi to Avos 2:5) or empty pit (Weiser) |
Where the authorities disagree
The root of behemah. Ibn Janach and Radak (each in his Sefer HaShorashim): a triliteral ב-ה-מ, a single beast or animals in general. Rabbi Yaakov Tzvi Mecklenburg: the beis is a prefix and the root is ה-מ-ה, "noise, confusion," since animals make confused sounds while human speech carries meaning. Ohalei Yehuda offers a merger of בה with המה, and alternatively bah mah, "what is in her?", the creature's insignificance beside man (compare Shemos 16:7-8).
Where be'ir sits in the root ב-ע-ר. Ibn Saruk, Ibn Janach and Radak all take be'ir from the triliteral ב-ע-ר, a root that carries removing, grazing, consuming, destroying, burning, kindling, and foolishness. Ibn Janach files be'ir under grazing, since animals are typified by eating; Ibn Saruk files it under ba'ar, "fool." Rashi (to Shemos 22:4) seems to weigh in for grazing, though his exact intent remains unclear (see Rabbi Yaakov Yechiel Weinberg, Seridei Aish vol. 4 Chakiras HaMekoros §7:2). Against them, Mitchell First (Words for the Wise, Kodesh Press 2022, p. 149) reasons that be'ir is unrelated to any of the other senses of ב-ע-ר, and notes that an Arabic cognate of that root means "camel" while in some dialects, South Arabic among them, it is a general word for animals much as biblical be'ir is; on that basis Rabbi Shet bar Yefet (Chemas HaChemdah to Shemos 22:4) argues that be'ir is in fact Arabic and not Hebrew.
Others read the bet of be'ir as no part of the root. Rabbi Shlomo Yehuda Rapoport, a son-in-law of the Ketzos HaChoshen whom the column notes is typically counted a maskil, argues that be'ir should be read "in the city," the bet being the prefix and ir the city, which he takes to reflect that be'ir means specifically the domesticated animals one would find in an urban setting, as against behemah, which can take in wild animals too (Tehillim 8:8). Similarly, Rabbi David Chaim Chelouche takes the core as ע-ר, "bare": the fool is bereft of the adornment of wisdom and so left bare, and the grazing animal bereaves the field of its produce and leaves it bare.
Which way the metaphor runs. Edel and the Malbim: a ba'ar is so called because his want of intelligence makes him like a be'ir. Ohalei Yehuda reverses it: the animal behaves like a ba'ar. A derashah on Tehillim 73:22 turns on the direction; a translation does not.
What bur means. Some explain it as a cognate of the other Mishnaic bur, an uncultivated, desolate field (Peah 2:1; Targum Onkelos to Bereishis 47:19; so Rashi, the Tashbetz, the Bartenura and others to Avos 2:5). Rabbi Dr. Asher Weiser: from bor, a pit, the man whose mind is empty, and he links be'er, a wellspring, which holds only so much water, and biur, explanation, the antidote to the ba'ar's ignorance, to that family. Rabbi Eliyahu HaBachur (Sefer HaTishbi): a form of ba'ar (Targum to Mishlei 12:1, 30:2). All three give the same English, differing on the image, not the sense.
Whether the English boor belongs here at all. The column reports that it had assumed the English word came from the Hebrew bur, and that when asked, the translator and literary critic Hillel Halkin, writing as Philologos, replied that the two are unrelated: Rabbinic Hebrew bur, he holds, is closer to the Aramaic bar, outside (as in baraisa), and has nothing to do with either biblical ba'ar or English boor. Halkin adds that the two words reach a similar meaning from opposite ends, bur out of rural values, where the ignorant mind is unfarmed land, and boor out of urban ones, where no one is as ignorant as a farmer. Etymologists give two main accounts of the English word: some derive it from the French bouvier, a herdsman, and so from the Latin bovarius, bovine, from bos/bov (the Celtic tribe called the Boii takes its name from Proto-Indo-European cognates of the same word for cattle, and lives on in the names Bohemia and Bavaria, as the ox's plowing lives on in boustrophedon, a script that runs one line left to right and the next right to left); others tie it to the Old English gebur, a dweller, peasant or farmer, cognate with the English neighbor and the German bauer.
Distinctions
be'ir (בעיר)
Only six occurrences in the sense of "animal" (Bereishis 45:17; Shemos 22:4; Bamidbar 20:4, 20:8, 20:11; Tehillim 78:48), against nearly two hundred for behemah. Rav Hirsch (to Bereishis 1:24, 45:17; Shemos 22:4; Vayikra 1:2; Tehillim 73:21): a creature totally subdued, more so than the merely domesticated behemah, trapped in a cage and doing only what instinct pushes it to do to survive, and so cognate with ba'ar, the boorish man likewise driven by nothing but his animal instincts. These nuances are lost in Targumic Aramaic, which renders both behemah and be'ir as be'ira. Some commentators read the name Bilam ben Beor here too, as an allusion to the Gemara's account of Bilam and his donkey: Bilam parses as a metathesized form of boel and Beor as a form of be'ir (Meor Ha'Afeilah to Bamidbar 22:2; Yad Ramah to Sanhedrin 105a).
behemah (בהמה) and chayah (חיה)
Rav Hirsch: behemah is related to bamah, an elevation or platform, since the animal subservient to man carries his menial work and so lifts him toward loftier things; alternatively animals are the lower rung of life, figuratively trodden upon by their servility to man, and he compares ב-ה-מ to פ-ע-מ, "stepping," by the interchange of bet with pei and hei with ayin. Chayah he takes from chai, life: the wild animal is an independent life-form, and animal life is a higher order than tzomeach. For the fuller treatment of this pair, including Ramban's division by diet, see animal-behemah-chayah.md.
ba'ar (בער) and bur (בור)
Ba'ar is Biblical, bur Mishnaic. Avos 2:5: a bur cannot be a fearer of Heaven. Dovid HaMelech puts the pair in one pasuk: "I am a ba'ar and I do not know, I was like an animal (behemos) with You" (Tehillim 73:22), the clearest place the language itself ties the beast to the boor.
Rendering guidance
- Trap: English "beast" swallows be'ir and behemah both, and "brute" swallows ba'ar and bur. Fix behemah as "animal," and reserve "beast" for be'ir where the two stand together.
- Tehillim 73:22, where ba'ar and behemah sit in one pasuk, wants two different English words: "brute" for the man, "animal" for the comparison.
- Shemos 22:4, the damages pasuk, is be'ir: "his animal" reads naturally, but where the sugya turns on the word, say "his beast" and gloss.
- Do not render bur "boor"; that English word carries a different insult.
Sources
Rabbi Reuven Chaim Klein, "Mishpatim: Boorish Animals," What's in a Word?, Ohr Somayach, 27 Shevat 5783 (2023-02-18): raw text in sources/whats-in-a-word/raw/10832-mishpatim-boorish-animals.md. Primary loci cited: Shemos 16:7-8, 22:4; Bereishis 1:24, 45:17, 47:19; Vayikra 1:2; Bamidbar 20:4-11, 22:2; Tehillim 8:8, 73:21-22, 78:48; Mishlei 12:1, 30:2; Avos 2:5; Peah 2:1; Sanhedrin 105a; Sefer HaShorashim; Ohalei Yehuda; Sefer HaTishbi; Meor Ha'Afeilah to Bamidbar 22:2; Yad Ramah to Sanhedrin 105a; Seridei Aish vol. 4 Chakiras HaMekoros §7:2; Mitchell First, Words for the Wise (Kodesh Press, 2022) p. 149; Chemas HaChemdah to Shemos 22:4; Hillel Halkin (Philologos). Everything in the Distinctions and in "Where the authorities disagree" traces to the column, its Arabic, Latin, Celtic and Old English material included, attributed as the column attributes it; Rabbi Shlomo Yehuda Rapoport's reading of be'ir as "in the city" is reported because the column reports it, which notes he is typically counted a maskil, and the Bottom line does not follow it. The Rendering guidance is this guide's own.