speech
witness
At a glance
In short
Eid is witness and eidus testimony; sahad is the Aramaic for the same, witness. Lavan named the mound Yegar Sahadusa, and Yaakov called it Gal-Eid (Bereishis 31:47). Rabbi Klein holds that, strictly speaking, the two are not quite synonyms: their meanings line up, but they come from two languages, as both Talmudim recognise in calling sahaduta Aramaic (Yerushalmi Sotah 7:2, Sanhedrin 10:1; Shabbos 115b; Megillah 9a). Malbim and Rabbi Shlomo Aharon Wertheimer nonetheless posit a difference. For Malbim, the eid of Iyov 16:19 attests to Iyov's conduct toward people and the sahad to his piety before Hashem; for Rabbi Wertheimer, eid names how the witness knows and sahad how he relays it. Eid also means warn, as Rabbi Shlomo Pappenheim explains, and Shadal makes warning the eid's primary role. One who dies al kiddush Hashem is called a kadosh, "holy," while the Syriac and Arabic words for a martyr, like the Greek behind English martyr, all mean "witness." Rabbi Klein reads that difference as a statement about how Judaism views martyrdom.
Distinctions
Eid (עד) and eidus (עדות)
Rabbi Pappenheim extends the idea from human witnesses to physical monuments and objects that keep a message before people, to which they "testify." A class of mitzvos is called eidos because they testify to events that befell Klal Yisrael (Devarim 4:45, 6:17; Tehillim 93:5, 119:2, 119:31). The second sense is warning: since one of a witness's main roles in court is to warn the would-be sinner of the consequences, eid took on "warn" outside any court setting (Bereishis 43:3; Shemos 19:21, 21:29). So the Torah itself is eidus (Shemos 26:33, 31:18; Bamidbar 18:2), most of its injunctions being prohibitions that warn, and an ox that has gored three times is a muad (Mishnah Bava Kamma 1:4, 2:4, 2:6, 3:8, 4:2, 4:5, 4:9) because its owner has already been warned that it is dangerous (Shemos 21:29).
Sahad (סהד)
The root seems to be ש-ה-ד. Twice in Tanach: Yegar Sahadusa, Lavan's name for the mound (Bereishis 31:47), and Iyov's sahadi on high (Iyov 16:19). It does not appear in the Mishnah, but sahadei, spelled with a samech, is the ordinary Talmudic Aramaic for witnesses, as in anan sahadi, "we testify." A kesubah from Damascus found in the Cairo Genizah, dated 933, uses eid and both spellings of sahad, with sin and with samech, interchangeably in the one document. Rabbi Yosef Kerman clarifies that the Aramaic word really begins with a sin, as in the two pesukim, though its cognates are often written with a samech, as in the Talmud.
Kadosh (קדוש)
A cognate of sahad is the Syriac Christian word for a martyr, which Islam took over as the Arabic shahid; both literally mean "witness," as does the Ancient Greek martur behind English martyr. (Arabic usually turns a Hebrew shin into its samech, but here it turns the sin of sahad into a shin.) The Jewish term for one who dies for his faith is kadosh, plural kedoshim, "holy." Rabbi Klein reads the difference as telling. Christianity and Islam, he writes, are far more concerned with proving the truth of their beliefs, and so see a co-religionist's death as testimony to that truth; Judaism does not accept that willingness to die proves anything, since many people fanatically believe all sorts of false ideas, and holds its truths to be self-evident, needing no such proof. Its focus is on what the death shows: that for this person Hashem and His word rise above everything, even his own life. The core of kedushah is separation, and Hashem is the ultimate Kadosh because He is different in kind from everything else; one killed al kiddush Hashem makes the ultimate declaration, but not proof, of Hashem's kedushah, and so is himself called kadosh. Rabbi Klein adds that language and terminology alone cannot fully capture these traditions, but calls the difference an important heuristic.
Where the authorities disagree
What separates eid from sahad. In Iyov 16:19 they stand in parallel ("my witness is in Heaven, my sahad on high"), Iyov poetically using sahad as the counterpart of eid.
- Malbim (there) posits a difference: eid attests to Iyov's upright conduct with other people, sahad to his piety before Hashem.
- Rabbi Shlomo Aharon Wertheimer (1866 to 1935), generally: eid relates to vaad, a meeting, the witness being one who happened to be present and so "met" the information, which names how he knows; sahad names his role in relaying what he saw, and he surmises it is related to heid, a thunderclap or echo (Yechezkel 7:7; Amos 4:13), a sound others hear.
- Rabbi Klein's own point is that the meanings of the two words line up, and that they are not strictly synonyms only because they come from two languages.
Where eid comes from.
- Menachem Ibn Saruk (920 to 970), Ibn Janach (990 to 1050) and Radak (1160 to 1235) give the biliteral ע-ד, but none offers a way to connect its many offshoots.
- Rabbi Shlomo Pappenheim (1740 to 1814; Yerios Shlomo, Cheshek Shlomo) makes the core "connecting one thing to another," as in ad, "until," in time, place or condition; hence moed, a meeting; eidah, a congregation; adi, an adornment joined to what it beautifies; and eden, enjoyment, which joins the one who enjoys to the thing enjoyed. Testimony connects an event to the one responsible for it.
- Rabbi Shlomo Ibn Parchon (twelfth century; Machberes HeAruch) derives eid from adi: as ornament marks a thing as special, testimony stands out from other speech in relaying important information.
- Rabbi Avraham Kobernick (Hipuch Osiyos) writes that ע-ד can be viewed as ד-ע, "knowledge," reversed, making the eid the one in the know, much as Rabbi Wertheimer's vaad does.
- Rabbi Wertheimer's explanation echoes Shadal (Rabbi Shmuel David Luzzatto, 1800 to 1865; to Bereishis 31:50 and Devarim 31:21, and Bikkurei Ittim 1829, pp. 194-196), who derives eid from a triliteral ע-ה-ד attested in Syriac but not in Tanach, meaning primarily to remember, mention, warn, which he takes as the eid's primary role, warning a sinner off a misdeed. Going a step further, he makes the core of that root the two letters ה-ד, to which Hebrew added an initial ayin and Aramaic an initial sin or samech, so that eid and sahad are etymologically related.
Whether sahad is related to sa'ad.
- Rav Hirsch (to Tehillim 20:3) says yes: sahad, with sin or samech, is related to ס-ע-ד, "support," by the interchange of hei and ayin. The connection is justified because a witness's role is to give testimony that could support one side of the case.
- Rabbi Yehudah Aryeh of Carpentras, an eighteenth-century grammarian and dayan, connects them similarly in Ohalei Yehuda, and also suggests sahad is a blend of zeh, "this" (sin or samech for zayin), and eid, which in some ways is like Shadal, since it too relates the two words.
- In the edition of Machberes Menachem published by Herschell Filipowsky (1816 to 1872), Menachem defines eid as sa'ad, which fits Rav Hirsch; in the unpublished edition prepared by Professor Ángel Sáenz-Badillo (1940 to 2013), he defines it as sahad, which is less novel.
Also discussed in
- Foreverעד (ע-ד)
- Signעד / eid
- Spoils of warעד / ad, eid (ע-ד, with adi)
- Trustסעד / saad
Radak on this root
Sefer HaShorashim
ק-ד-ש
To be holy, and to make holy; also, to become forbidden, as holy things are. A second sense is designating, as in appointing a fast or a war.
Holier than you
אַל־תִּגַּשׁ־בִּי כִּי קְדַשְׁתִּיךָ (Yeshayahu 65:5), do not come near me, for קְדַשְׁתִּיךָ, which means קדשתי ממך, I am holier than you.
Forbidden, as holy things are
פֶּן־תִּקְדַּשׁ הַֽמְלֵאָה הַזֶּרַע (Devarim 22:9), lest the full yield of the seed תקדש, which he glosses: lest it become forbidden in benefit, as kodesh is. So Chazal said (Kiddushin 56b): from where do we know that kilayim of the vineyard are forbidden in benefit? It says there ואיש כי יקדיש את ביתו קדש, and when a man consecrates his house as holy, and it says here פן תקדש; as there it is forbidden in benefit, so here.
What Chaggai asked the kohanim
וְאֶל־כָּל־מַֽאֲכָל הֲיִקְדָּשׁ (Chaggai 2:12), or any food, היקדש: he glosses it היטמא, will it become tamei, that is, forbidden by its tumah as kodesh is forbidden. Chaggai was putting the laws of tumah to the kohanim, which they may have forgotten in the galus. His question was whether the food that stands fourth in tumah is tamei, the food alone, since he says היקדש, in the singular, and not היקדשו, in the plural; and they said no. Some of Chazal hold (Pesachim 17a) that the kohanim erred in this answer, a fourth degree being tamei in kodesh, though to the other question, of one made tamei by a corpse, they answered rightly. On this view, as Radak explains it, they knew a third degree in kodesh to be tamei but not a fourth, and in that they erred; that is why the navi answered them וַֽאֲשֶׁר יַקְרִיבוּ שָׁם טָמֵא הֽוּא, and what they offer there is tamei. Others of Chazal hold that they erred in neither; others, that Chaggai first asked them about a fifth degree in kodesh, and they rightly answered that it is not tamei; others, that he asked them before the decree on a fourth degree in kodesh. On the view that they did not err, Radak explains the navi's answer: though they know the laws of tumah and taharah, all that they offer is as though tamei, since they are slack in building the Beis. The whole parsha, he holds, bears out that they did not err, since throughout it the navi rebukes them over nothing but the Beis.
What touches holy things
כֹּל אֲשֶׁר־יִגַּע בִּבְשָׂרָהּ יִקְדָּשׁ (Vayikra 6:20), whatever touches its flesh becomes holy: food that touches the flesh of the chatas and absorbs from it becomes holy as it is. If the chatas is pasul, by piggul or some other disqualification, what touches it is pasul; if it is fit, what touches it is eaten by the stricter of the two. So shelamim flesh slaughtered the day before that touched a chatas slaughtered today is eaten that day only, by the law of shelamim, which are eaten for two days and one night, and not that night as the chatas is; and where both were slaughtered today, the shelamim flesh is eaten by the law of the chatas, that day and night only, and not the next day as other shelamim. כָּל־הַנֹּגֵעַ בַּמִּזְבֵּחַ יִקְדָּֽשׁ (Shemos 29:37), whatever touches the mizbeach becomes holy: even a korban already pasul that has gone up on the mizbeach is made fit by it, and once it has gone up it does not come down; and that is where it was fit for the mizbeach to begin with and became pasul only by one of the things that disqualify a korban. So too כָּל־הַנֹּגֵעַ בָּהֶם יִקְדָּֽשׁ (Shemos 30:29), whatever touches them becomes holy, said of the klei shareis: whatever has entered one is holy with kedushas haguf, so as to be made pasul by any of the things that disqualify what has kedushas haguf, and it cannot be redeemed to go out to chullin.
The sanctuary, and the palace
וְעָשׂוּ לִי מִקְדָּשׁ (Shemos 25:8), and they shall make Me a sanctuary: the house of holiness is called מִקְדָּשׁ. A king's palace is called so as well, since it is like a mikdash, where none enter but those known there: כִּי מִקְדַּשׁ־מֶלֶךְ הוּא (Amos 7:13), for it is a king's mikdash. And וָאֱהִי לָהֶם לְמִקְדָּשׁ מְעַט (Yechezkel 11:16), and I have been to them a little mikdash, is in the way of מִגְדַּל־עֹז שֵׁם י"י (Mishlei 18:10), the name of Hashem is a tower of strength: they are secure in Him a little while they are in galus.
Two readings of וְהָיָה לְמִקְדָּשׁ
Some read וְהָיָה לְמִקְדָּשׁ (Yeshayahu 8:14), and He shall be for a mikdash, from this sense, that is, a place a man goes to be secure. On that reading לִשְׁנֵי בָתֵּי יִשְׂרָאֵל, for the two houses of Yisrael, is to the one for good and to the other for ill, since Shevna and his party had made peace with the king of Ashur and Chizkiyahu and his party had not. It can also be read as designation, a designation of punishment, a stumbling block set before them, as וְנָתַתִּי מִכְשׁוֹל לְפָנָיו (Yechezkel 3:20), and I shall set a stumbling block before him; the two houses are then Pekach ben Remalyahu and Shevna with his party, both of whom wanted the kingdom of Beis David to fall.
Making holy, and consecrating
וְלֹֽא־יְקַדְּשׁוּ אֶת־הָעָם בְּבִגְדֵיהֶֽם (Yechezkel 44:19), and they shall not make the people holy with their garments: that the kohanim not make them holy by touching them in the bigdei kehunah, since if the people touched their garments they would seem to be holy like them. So too Yonasan renders it, וְלָא יִתְעָרְבוּן עִם עַמָא בִּלְבוּשֵׁיהוֹן, and they shall not mingle with the people in their garments. הַזָּכָר תַּקְדִּישׁ (Devarim 15:19), the male you shall consecrate: though it is holy from the womb, one must say, it is holy as a bechor. לֹֽא־יַקְדִּישׁ אִישׁ אֹתוֹ (Vayikra 27:26), no man shall consecrate it: he may not consecrate it for another korban. וְהִקְדִּישׁוּ אֶת־קְדוֹשׁ יַֽעֲקֹב (Yeshayahu 29:23), and they shall hallow the Holy One of Yaakov: they shall give Him holiness in their praise.
Appointing, and what is appointed
קַדְּשׁוּ־צוֹם קִרְאוּ עֲצָרָה (Yoel 1:14), appoint a fast, call an assembly, and קַדְּשׁוּ עָלֶיהָ מִלְחָמָה (Yirmiyahu 6:4), appoint war against her: these and all like them are the sense of designating. כְּלֵיל הִתְקַדֶּשׁ־חָג (Yeshayahu 30:29) and הִתְקַדְּשׁוּ וּבָאתֶם (Shmuel I 16:5) are listed with these, but he holds it right to take them from the first sense, holiness. כְּלֵיל הִתְקַדֶּשׁ־חָג then means that the night on which Sancheriv's army dies will be a joy to you like the night on which the festival is hallowed, the night of Pesach, and הִתְקַדְּשׁוּ וּבָאתֶם is make yourselves holy and come. The קָדֵשׁ and the קְדֵשָׁה, as in לֹא־תִֽהְיֶה קְדֵשָׁה (Devarim 23:18), there shall be no קדשה, are all of them those designated for lying with.
וְקָדַשׁ הוּא וּבְגָדָיו (שמות כט, כא), כִּי קָדֵֽשׁוּ (במדבר יז, ב), אַל־תִּגַּשׁ־בִּי כִּי קְדַשְׁתִּיךָ (ישעיה סה, ה), פירוש קדשתי ממך. וְאַף כִּי הַיּוֹם יִקְדַּשׁ בַּכֶּֽלִי (שמואל א' כא, ו), פֶּן־תִּקְדַּשׁ הַֽמְלֵאָה הַזֶּרַע (דברים כב, ט), פן תאסר בהנאה כקדש. וכן אמרו רבותינו ז"ל (קידושין נו, ע"ב) מנין לכלאי הכרם שאסורים בהנאה? נאמר להלן ואיש כי יקדיש את ביתו קדש לי"י ונאמר כאן פן תקדש מה להלן אסור בהנאה אף כאן אסור בהנאה. וכן וְאֶל־כָּל־מַֽאֲכָל הֲיִקְדָּשׁ (חגי ב, יב) פרוש היטמא, כלומר שיאסר מפני טומאתו כקדש שהוא אסור. ופירוש הפסוק ששאל חגי לכהנים תורת הטומאות אולי שכחו בגלות, ושאל להם אם יִשָּׂא־אִישׁ בְּשַׂר־קֹדֶשׁ בִּכְנַף בִּגְדוֹ (שם) פירוש בכנף בגדו שהוא טמא שנגע בשרץ, ונשא בשר קדש בכנף בגדו הנה הכנף ראשון לטומאה ובשר קדש שני, וְנָגַע בִּכְנָפוֹ אֶל־הַלֶּחֶם (שם) פירוש במה שבכנפו והוא הבשר נגע בו אל הלחם או אל הנזיד או אל היין או אל השמן ונגעו אליו אל המאכל היקדש? פירוש היטמא המאכל הזה שהוא רביעי לטומאה, כי השרץ הוא אב הטומאה והכנף ראשון של טומאה, ובשר קדש שני והלחם והנזיד והמשקין הללו שנגעו בבשר הם שלישי והמאכל שנגע באלו רביעי ועל זה שאלם על המאכל שהוא רביעי אב הוא טמא ואמרו לא. והראיה כי על המאכל לבדו שאלם שאמר היקדש ולא אמר היקדשו. ויש מרבותינו ז"ל שאמר (פסחים יז, ע"א) כי טעו הכהנים בזו התשובה, כי הרביע טמא הוא בקדש, אבל על דרך ההשאלה האחרת ששאלם אם יגע טְמֵא נֶפֶשׁ בְּכֹל־אֵלֶּה השיבוהו כראוי, פירוש אם תהיה הכנף טמאה טומאת נפש שנמצא שהכנף אב הטומאה והבשר ולד ראשון, והלחם והנזיר והמשקין שני והמאכל שלישי, ויענו הכהנים ויאמרו יטמא. ושלישי בקדש היו יודעין שהוא טמא אבל רביעי בקדש לא היו יודעין שהוא טמא ובזה טעו, לפיכך השיבם הנביא וַֽאֲשֶׁר יַקְרִיבוּ שָׁם טָמֵא הֽוּא (פסחים ב, יד). ויש מרבותינו ז"ל שאמרו (שם) כי לא טעו באחת מהן. ויש מהן שאמרו כי חמישי בקדש שאל מהן בראשונה וכראוי השיבוהו שאינו טמא. ויש מהן שאמרו (שם) כי קודם שגזרו רביעי בקדש שאלם וכראוי השיבוהו. ומזה שהשיב להם וַֽאֲשֶׁר יַקְרִיבוּ שָׁם טָמֵא הֽוּא פירוש אף על פי שהם יודעים הלכות טומאה וטהרה כל אשר יקריבו לפני כאילו הוא טמא הואיל והם מתעצלים בבנין הבית. וענין הפרשה מוכיח זה הטעם שלא טעו, שלא הוכיחם אלא על ענין הבית בכל הפרשה. כֹּל אֲשֶׁר־יִגַּע בִּבְשָׂרָהּ יִקְדָּשׁ (ויקרא ו, כ), פירוש כל דבר אוכל שיגע בבשר החטאת ויבלע ממנה יקדש, כלומר יהיה קדש כמוה שאם פסולה היא החטאת כגון פיגול או פסול אחר יפסל הנוגע בה ואם כשרה היא יאכל הנוגע בה כחָמוּר שבה, כלומר אם נגע בשר שלמים שנשחט מאתמול בחטאת שנשחטה היום נאכל אותו בשר שלמים בו ביום בלבד כדין שלמים הנאכלים לשני ימים ולילה אחת, אבל לא בלילה כבשר החטאת שהחטאת נאכלת ליום ולילה, הנה לפי שהחומרא עכשיו בבשר שלמים נאכלת כדין בשר שלמים, ואם החומרא בבשר החטאת כגון שנשחטו היום החטאת והשלמים ונגע בשר השלמים בחטאת נאכל כדין חטאת היום והלילה בלבד אבל לא למחר כשאר בשר שלמים. וזהו פירוש יאכל כחמור שבה. כָּל־הַנֹּגֵעַ בַּמִּזְבֵּחַ יִקְדָּֽשׁ (שמות כט, לז), אפילו קרבן פסול שעלה עליו קדשו המזבח להכשירו, וכיון שעלה לא ירד והוא שיהא ראוי למזבח אלא שנפסל באחד מהדברים הפוסלים הקרבן. וכן כָּל־הַנֹּגֵעַ בָּהֶם יִקְדָּֽשׁ (שמות ל, כט), שנאמר בכלי שרת משנכנס לתוכו קדש קדושת הגוף ליפסל באחד מן הדברים הפוסלים הדברים שיש להם קדושת הגוף ואינו נפדה לצאת לחולין. והשם קֹדֶשׁ הֽוּא (שמות כט, לד), והקבוץ מִקָּדְשֵׁי הַקֳּדָשִׁים (ויקרא כא, כב), וְאִישׁ אֶת־קֳדָשָׁיו לוֹ יִֽהְיוּ (במדבר ה, י). ובלא חטף כְּצֹאן קָֽדָשִׁים (יחזקאל לו, לח), קָֽדָשַׁי בָּזִית (יחזקאל כב, ח). ומשקל אחר אֶת־מִקְדְּשׁוֹ מִמֶּֽנּוּ (במדבר יח, כט), ובית הקדש נקרא מקדש. וְעָשׂוּ לִי מִקְדָּשׁ (שמות כה, ח), וּמִקְדָּשִׁי תִּירָאוּ (ויקרא יט, ל), והקבוץ וְהַטֵּף אֶל־מִקְדָּשִׁים (יחזקאל כא, ז). וכן ארמון המלך לפי שהוא כמקדש שלא יכנסו שם אלא הידועים נקרא כן כִּי מִקְדַּשׁ־מֶלֶךְ הוּא (עמוס ז, יג), וּבָא אֶל־מִקְדָּשׁוֹ לְהִתְפַּלֵּל וְלֹא יוּכָֽל (ישעיה טז, יב), חִלַּלְתָּ מִקְדָּשֶׁיךָ (יחזקאל כח, יח). ויש מפרשים מזה וְהָיָה לְמִקְדָּשׁ (ישעיה ח, יד), כלומר מקום שילך אדם להשגב בו. ולזה הפירוש יהיה פירוש לִשְׁנֵי בָתֵּי יִשְׂרָאֵל (שם) לאחד לטוב ולאחד לרע, כי שבנא וסיעתו השלימו עם מלך אשור וחזקיה וסיעתו לא השלימו. וזהו שאמר (שם) לֹֽא־תֹֽאמְרוּן קֶשֶׁר לְכֹל אֲשֶׁר־יֹאמַר הָעָם הַזֶּה קָשֶׁר נראה כי מקצת העם היה קושרין ומורדים לתת העיר ביד מלך אשור. ואמר לחזקיה וסיעתו יהיה שם הקדוש ברוך הוא למקדש ולארמון להשגב בו ולבית הקושרים יהיה לאבן נגף ולצור מכשול. ויש לפרש עוד למקדש להזמנה כלומר להזמנת פורענות כלומר למכשול יהיה לפניהם כמו שאמר וְנָתַתִּי מִכְשׁוֹל לְפָנָיו (יחזקאל ג, כ). ויהיה פירוש לִשְׁנֵי בָתֵּי יִשְׂרָאֵל פקח בן רמליהו ושבנא וסיעתו, כי שניהם היו רוצים במפלת מלכות בית דוד. ויהיה פירוש ליושב ירושילם בעבור יושב ירושלם והוא חזקיה וסיעתו. וָאֱהִי לָהֶם לְמִקְדָּשׁ מְעַט (יחזקאל יא, טז), על דרך מִגְדַּל־עֹז שֵׁם י"י (משלי יח, י), כלומר שהם נשגבים בו מעט בעודם בגלות. וְנִֽחֲלוּ מְקַדְשֵׁיהֶֽם (משלי ז, כד), כמו מִקְדְשֵׁיהֶם, אלא שהוא משקל אחר האחד ממנו מְקָדֵשׁ בשקל לִמְתָעֵֽב גּוֹי (ישעיה מט, ז). והתאר קָדשׁ הוּא (במדבר ו, ח), קְדשִׁים יִֽהְיוּ לֵאלֹהֵיהֶם (ויקרא כא, ו). והנפעל וְנִקְדַּשׁ בִּכְבֹדִֽי (שמות כט, מג), וְנִקְדַּשְׁתִּי בָכֶם לְעֵינֵי הַגּוֹיִֽם (יחזקאל כ, מא), בִּקְרֹבַי אֶקָּדֵשׁ (ויקרא י, ג). וההתפעל וְהִתְגַּדִּלְתִּי וְהִתְקַדִּשְׁתִּי (יחזקאל לח, כג), לֹא־הִתְקַדְּשׁוּ לְמַדַּי (דברי הימים ב' ל, ג), וְהִיא מִתְקַדֶּשֶׁת מִטֻּמְאָתָהּ (שמואל ב' יא, ד) הַמִּתְקַדְּשִׁים וְהַמִּֽטַּֽהֲרִים (ישעיה סו, יז). והפעל הכבד [פִּעֵל] וַיְקַדֵּשׁ אֹתוֹ (בראשית ב, ג), קַדֶּשׁ־לִי כָל־בְּכוֹר (שמות יג, ב). וְלֹֽא־יְקַדְּשׁוּ אֶת־הָעָם בְּבִגְדֵיהֶֽם (יחזקאל מד, יט), פירוש שלא יקדשו אותם בנגעם בהם בבגדי כהונה, כי אם יגעו העם בבגדיהם ידמה שהם קדושים כמוהם. וכן תרגם יונתן וְלָא יִתְעָרְבוּן עִם עַמָא בִּלְבוּשֵׁיהוֹן. וכבד אחר [הִפְעִיל] אֲשֶׁר הִקְדִּישׁ (שמואל ב' ח, יא), הִקְדַּשְׁתִּי אֹתָם לִֽי (במדבר ח, יז). כָּֽל־הַבְּכוֹר אֲשֶׁר יִוָּלֵד בִּבְקָֽרְךָ וּבְצֹֽאנְךָ הַזָּכָר תַּקְדִּישׁ (דברים טו, יט), פירוש אף על פי שקדושתו מרחם צריך לומר הרי הוא קדוש לבכורה. לֹֽא־יַקְדִּישׁ אִישׁ אֹתוֹ (ויקרא כז, כו), פירוש לא יקדישנו לקרבן אחר. וְהִקְדִּישׁוּ אֶת־קְדוֹשׁ יַֽעֲקֹב (ישעיה כט, כג), פירוש יתנו לו הקדושה בתהלתם. ועניו אחר קַדְּשׁוּ עָלֶיהָ מִלְחָמָה (ירמיה ו, ד), קַדְּשׁוּ־צוֹם קִרְאוּ עֲצָרָה (יואל א, יד), וַיַּקְדִּשׁוּ אֶת־קֶדֶשׁ בַּגָּלִיל בְּהַר נַפְתָּלִי (יהושע כ, ז), וַיְקַדֵּשׁ אֶת־יִשַׁי וְאֶת־בָּנָיו (שמואל א' טז, ה). וכבד אחר [הִפְעִיל] הִקְדִּישׁ קְרֻאָֽיו (צפניה א, ז), וְהַקְדִּשֵׁם לְיוֹם הֲרֵגָֽה (ירמיה יב, ג). וההתפעל כְּלֵיל הִתְקַדֶּשׁ־חָג (ישעיה ל, כט), הִתְקַדְּשׁוּ וּבָאתֶם אִתִּי בַּזָּבַח (שמאל א' טז, ה). והשם וְהָיָה לְמִקְדָּשׁ (ישעיה ח, יד), ענינם וכל הדומים להם ענין הזמנה. ונכון הוא להיות כְּלֵיל הִתְקַדֶּשׁ־חָג, הִתְקַדְּשׁוּ וּבָאתֶם, מהענין הראשון כלומר הלילה הזה שימות בו חיל סנחריב יהיה לכם שמחה כלילה שמקדשין בו החג והוא ליל הפסח. וְגַם־קָדֵשׁ הָיָה בָאָרֶץ (מלכים א' יד, כד), וְחַיָּתָם בַּקְּדֵשִֽׁים (איוב לו, יד), וַיַּֽעֲבֵר הַקְּדֵשִׁים מִן־הָאָרֶץ (מלכים א' טו, יב), לֹא־תִֽהְיֶה קְדֵשָׁה (דברים כג, יח), וְלֹא־יִֽהְיֶה קָדֵשׁ (שם), כלם ענינם שהם מזומנים למשכב.
Radak, Sefer HaShorashim, Berlin 1847. Public domain, digitised by Sefaria from the National Library of Israel.
Rav Pappenheim on this root
Cheshek Shlomo
ע-ד
In English, our account of his entry
Coming together: things joined to each other, or two joined in a third that binds them. So until and for ever, meeting and set time, still, ornament, delight, witness.
Until: a thing joined to a limit
He calls עד a noun, a verb and a particle, and all three mean ועד והתחבר דברים זה לזה, meeting and the joining of things to each other, whether they were joined from the start or join when one moves to the other. As a particle, עד marks a thing's joining to a particular limit, showing how far it reaches. The limit may be of place, עד מקום שכם עד אלון מורה (Bereishis 12:6), as far as the place of Shechem, as far as Elon Moreh; of time, עד עצם היום הזה (Vayikra 23:14), until this very day, and עד הנה (Bereishis 44:28), until now; or of a matter, עד אשר תפרה (Shemos 23:30), until you are fruitful, and עד בואכם עד המקום הזה (Devarim 1:31), until you came to this place.
The limit included, or left out
Sometimes the limit itself belongs to what is joined to it, which is called עד ועד בכלל, until with the limit included: מראשו ועד רגליו (Vayikra 13:12), from his head to his feet, the feet included, and מיום הראשון עד יום השביעי (Shemos 12:15), from the first day until the seventh day, the seventh day too falling under the ban on chametz. So too מקטן ועד גדול (Bereishis 19:11), both small and great. Sometimes the limit stands outside it and only marks how far the thing reaches, which is called עד ולא עד בכלל, until with the limit left out: מערב עד ערב תשבתו שבתכם (Vayikra 23:32), from evening to evening you shall keep your rest, the second evening not part of the rest; ועד הים האחרון יהיה גבולכם (Devarim 11:24), up to the Western Sea shall be your border, the sea not within it except for some islands; and עד הביאכם את קרבן אלהיכם (Vayikra 23:14), until you have brought the offering of your God, since the new grain is permitted once the offering is brought. In all of these the limit is named.
For ever: the limit hidden
To show that a thing lasts without bound or end, the limit is hidden and עד stands alone, meaning continuance up to a hidden limit that cannot be fixed: any limit one pictures is not it, and so the thing goes on always. So רם ונשא שכן עד (Yeshayahu 57:15), high and exalted, dwelling for ever; בטחו בה׳ עדי-עד (Yeshayahu 26:4), trust in Hashem for ever; and ויתפצצו הררי-עד (Chavakuk 3:6), the everlasting mountains were shattered. That is ועד, as in ה׳ ימלוך לעלם ועד (Shemos 15:18), Hashem shall reign for ever and ever, which is לעולם גם עד, for ever and also without limit. Sometimes the everlasting limit is named outright, ומעולם עד-עולם אתה אל (Tehillim 90:2), from everlasting to everlasting You are God, and לדוד ולזרעו עד-עולם (Tehillim 18:51), to David and to his seed for ever, which is the limit included; sometimes both are said, עד-עולמי עד (Yeshayahu 45:17), to worlds without end, meaning worlds that go on for ever. And עד may be said of a beginning, to say that it has no limit: הזאת ידעת מני-עד (Iyov 20:4), do you know this, from of old, meaning from the hidden limit in time at which the thing began.
With a suffix: to
With suffixes עד stands in place of אל, to: האזינה עדי בנו צפר (Bamidbar 23:18), give ear to me, son of Tzippor, where עדי is אלי, to me; עדיך כל בשר יבאו (Tehillim 65:3), to You all flesh shall come; and ועדיכם אתבונן (Iyov 32:12), and to you I gave heed.
עדה, to reach, and בלעדי
From the particle a verb is made, עדה: לא-עדה עליו שחל (Iyov 28:8), the lion has not passed over it, meaning it did not come up to it, just as ותהינו לעלות ההרה (Devarim 1:41), and you made ready to go up the mountain, is made from הן, here. By compounding comes בלעדי, which is בל-עדי, not with me, the thing not joined to me: ויען יוסף את-פרעה לאמר, בלעדי (Bereishis 41:16), and Yosef answered Pharaoh, saying, it is not in me; and בלעדי, רק אשר אכלו הנערים (Bereishis 14:24), nothing for me, only what the young men have eaten, meaning nothing as touching me, only as what the young men ate. Without a suffix it serves as זולת, apart from: מבלעדי אישך (Bamidbar 5:20), other than your husband, a lying in which your husband has no share.
בעד: about, through, for
With the bet of instrument and limit comes בעד: כי עצר ה׳ בעד כל רחם (Bereishis 20:18), for Hashem had closed up every womb, that is, about the surface joined to the womb; בעד החלון נשקפה (Shoftim 5:28), through the window she looked out; and הבעד ערפל ישפוט? (Iyov 22:13), can He judge through the thick cloud? In construct it is always pointed with a sheva; standing alone it takes a patach, as מבעד לצמתך (Shir HaShirim 4:1), from behind your veil, and with a suffix always a patach: ויתפלל בעדך וחיה (Bereishis 20:7), and he will pray for you and you shall live; וכפר בעדך ובעד העם (Vayikra 9:7), and make atonement for yourself and for the people; and וכפר בעדו ובעד ביתו (Vayikra 16:6), and he shall make atonement for himself and for his household.
עדנה and עדן: until now
Sometimes עד is compounded with הן and הנה, here: המה חיים עדנה (Koheles 4:2), who are alive still, as עד הנה, until now; and את אשר-עדן לא היה (Koheles 4:3), the one who has not yet been, as עד הן, likewise until now. It is the Talmud's עדיין, still.
The verb: two equals met in a third
As a verb, עד is the joining of two equal subjects in a third, which is the limit binding them together. ונועדתי לך שם (Shemos 25:22), and I will meet with you there: the speech was shared by Hakadosh Baruch Hu and Moshe, and the Mishkan was the limit joining them. So אשר אועד לך שמה (Shemos 30:6), where I will meet with you, and ונועדתי שמה לבני ישראל (Shemos 29:43), and I will meet there with Bnei Yisrael: the revelation of the Shechinah and the appearing of Bnei Yisrael are united in the Mishkan, and so it is called אהל מועד, the Tent of Meeting. With a vav in place of the nun, ויועדו יחדו לבוא (Iyov 2:11), they arranged together to come, setting themselves a place to join; so ונועדה יחדו (Nechemiah 6:2), let us meet together, and נועד אל-בית האלהים (Nechemiah 6:10), let us meet at the house of God.
Two tents of meeting
The name serves both the tent set apart for Hashem's speech with Moshe, ומשה יקח את-האהל ... וקרא לו אהל מועד (Shemos 33:7), and Moshe would take the tent ... and called it the Tent of Meeting, and the tent set apart for the revelation of the Shechinah to Yisrael, which is the Mishkan, בבואם אל אהל מועד (Shemos 28:43), when they come into the Tent of Meeting. So ונועדו אליך כל העדה אל פתח אהל מועד (Bamidbar 10:3), and all the congregation shall gather to you at the entrance of the Tent of Meeting, and ונועדו אליך הנשיאים (Bamidbar 10:4), and the princes shall gather to you, that is, to the bounded place where you are; and ובית מועד לכל-חי (Iyov 30:23), and the house appointed for all the living.
עדה, a gathering
From this comes the noun עדה: ותקהל העדה (Vayikra 8:4), and the congregation was assembled, and עדת בני ישראל (Shemos 16:1), the congregation of Bnei Yisrael. Any number of people bounded to join in a bounded place, or gathered by a bounded purpose, is an עדה. So והנה עדת דבורים בגוית האריה (Shoftim 14:8), and behold, a swarm of bees in the lion's carcass: bees, gathered together in the hive for one purpose, are rightly called an עדה.
יעוד, designation
Of the same is יעוד, bounding and appointing to a particular purpose that brings two together, which is marriage: אשר-לו יעדה והפדה... ואם-לבנו ייעדנה (Shemos 21:8-9), who designated her for himself, he shall let her be redeemed ... and if he designates her for his son. So ואל-חוף הים שם יעדה (Yirmiyahu 47:7), and to the seashore, there He has appointed it, and אנה פניך מעדות (Yechezkel 21:21), wherever your face is set.
מועד, the appointed time
From יעוד comes מועד, time designated and bounded: והיו לאתת ולמועדים (Bereishis 1:14), and they shall be for signs and for seasons; למועד הזה בשנה האחרת (Bereishis 17:21), at this set time next year; אלה מועדי ה׳ (Vayikra 23:2), these are the appointed seasons of Hashem; חסידה בשמים ידעה מועדיה (Yirmiyahu 8:7), the stork in the heavens knows her seasons. All are the bounding of time, and the bounding of the doer to a particular deed that brings time and doer together. That is התוועדות, meeting, itself: time and doer are two subjects, and the action the third that joins them. The difference between ועד, עת and זמן, meeting, time and season, he sets out at length in his Yerios Shlomo.
עוד, more and still
From the same meeting comes עוד, excess and addition, what is joined to what is already there: עוד היום גדול (Bereishis 29:7), the day is yet long; והברד לא יהיה עוד (Shemos 9:29), and there will be no more hail; ועל הארץ מתחת אין עוד (Devarim 4:39), and on the earth below there is no other. It serves too for continuing in existence: עוד כל ימי הארץ (Bereishis 8:22), while the earth remains; לא יקרא עוד את שמך אברם (Bereishis 17:5), your name shall no longer be called Avram; עוד זה מדבר וזה בא (Iyov 1:16), while this one was still speaking, another came; and with a suffix, עודנו מדבר עמם (Bereishis 29:9), while he was still speaking with them, and הבשר עודנו בין שניהם (Bamidbar 11:33), the meat was still between their teeth. In every continuing a fresh stretch is joined to the one before, and so עוד is said of both.
עוד against בעוד
Within continuing, עוד and בעוד differ. עוד without the bet is the full stretch: כי לימים עוד שבעה אנכי ממטיר על הארץ (Bereishis 7:4), for in seven more days I will bring rain upon the earth, the seven days running first and then the rain; עוד ארבעים יום ונינוה נהפכת (Yonah 3:4), forty more days and Nineveh is overturned, the forty days complete and then the overturning. בעוד, with the bet, is a stretch not complete: the later thing enters before the bounded time is finished and is swallowed in the earlier, as בעוד שלשת ימים ישא פרעה את-ראשך (Bereishis 40:19), within three days Pharaoh will lift up your head, the lifting falling inside the three days; and הן בעודני חי עמכם היום ממרים הייתם (Devarim 31:27), even while I am still alive with you today you have been rebellious. The bet of בעוד is the bet of within, as in בעת ההיא, at that time, and בימים ההם, in those days.
מעוד: from the beginning
With a mem, עוד marks the start of a thing's continuing: מעודי עד-היום הזה (Bereishis 48:15), ever since I was, to this day, that is, from when my עוד, my continuing in existence, began, since a whole thing is sometimes named for its beginning. So מעודך עד-היום הזה (Bamidbar 22:30), ever since you were, to this day. The mem of מעוד is the mem of מן, from, as in מערב עד ערב, from evening to evening, מעת (Yeshayahu 48:16), from the time, and מאז היתה לגוי (Shemos 9:24), since it became a nation.
עודד, to keep up
From עוד as continuing in existence comes the verb עודד, its dalet doubled for continuance carried far: קמנו ונתעודד (Tehillim 20:9), we have risen and stand upright; יתום ואלמנה יעודד (Tehillim 146:9), He upholds the orphan and the widow; מעודד ענוים (Tehillim 147:6), He upholds the humble: they are given continuance, long and abundant, so that whenever they are liable to stop, they go on.
עדי, ornament: beauty as relation
From ועד comes עדי, the ornament that beautifies its wearer: ולא-שתו איש עדיו עליו (Shemos 33:4), and no man put on his ornaments; המעלה עדי זהב (Shmuel II 1:24), who put on you ornaments of gold; וככלה תעדה כליה (Yeshayahu 61:10), as a bride adorns herself with her jewels; ותעד נזמה וחליתה (Hoshea 2:15), she decked herself with her nose-ring and her jewelry. It is from meeting: the ornament and its wearer are two subjects and the sense of sight a third, where they meet and bring forth beauty and splendour. The beauty is a relation, lying neither in the ornament alone nor in the wearer alone but in the two together, when the eye takes them in and finds them suited to each other. There are ornaments not fine in themselves that look fine and splendid on the one who wears them, and fine ones that turn ugly on a man whose figure does not suit them, like נזם זהב באף חזיר (Mishlei 11:22), a gold ring in a pig's snout.
עד, spoil: the finery stripped
The word is said of removing the ornament too: חבלי רשעים עודני (Tehillim 119:61), the bands of the wicked have stripped me, meaning they took my ornaments from me, as ודשנו את המזבח (Bamidbar 4:13), and they shall clear the ashes from the altar, is the removal of the ashes, and מפני רשעים זו שדוני (Tehillim 17:9), from the wicked who despoil me, is the taking away of my breast and what it yields. From stripping ornaments comes עד, spoil: בבקר יאכל עד (Bereishis 49:27), in the morning he devours the spoil; אז חלק עד-שלל (Yeshayahu 33:23), then spoil and plunder were divided; ליום קומי לעד (Tzefaniah 3:8), for the day I rise up to the spoil. It is a particular name for the kinds of ornaments and finery that men of war adorn themselves with, stripped from them when they are taken captive; compare שוד, which speaks both of sucking out and of robbery.
בגד עדים: the plunderers' garment
Of the same is עדים in וכבגד עדים כל-צדקתינו (Yeshayahu 64:5), and all our righteousness is like a garment of עדים: a garment of those who plunder the finery of war, one tearing it this way and another that, until it rips. So too מעדה-בגד ביום קרה (Mishlei 25:20), a plunderers' garment on a cold day, slack and weak, which gives no warmth on a cold day; the mem is that of a noun, as in מעטה תהלה (Yeshayahu 61:3), a mantle of praise, and כל כלי מעשה (Bamidbar 31:51), every wrought article.
Chazal's עד: a rag, or a witness
From the words of Chazal it would seem that עדים and מעדה are a rag or patch, called עדים because it is joined in, bringing the two sides of a tear together. In Masechta Niddah: בדקה עצמה בעד שלה (Niddah 14a), she examined herself with her cloth, and המשמשת בעדים (Niddah 5a), she who uses cloths, that is, a rag kept for wiping. But Rav Pappenheim finds no proof there: עד and עדים may be from testimony and seeing, since the rag one wipes with testifies whether there is blood or not; and that is why the words are found only in Niddah, while elsewhere the Talmud calls a rag סמרטוט and מטלית.
Or a garment made for show
Perhaps בגד עדים in the pasuk is from עדי in its plain sense, a garment made for ornament, slack and light, not strong like other garments since it is made only for beauty: worn two or three times it tears, and so are all our righteous deeds, without strength. Then מעדה-בגד ביום קרה is a verb, formed like מרבה, one who increases: one who adorns himself on a cold day with a garment made for ornament, light and weak, which gives no warmth, as in וככלה תעדה כליה, as a bride adorns herself with her jewels.
עדן, delight of touch and taste
Further from ועד come the nouns עדן ומעדן, which are pleasure and enjoyment. Of touch: היתה-לי עדנה (Bereishis 18:12), I have had delight; המלבשכם שני עם-עדנים (Shmuel II 1:24), who clothed you in scarlet with delights; מעדנות כימה (Iyov 38:31), the delights of Kimah; עדינה היושבת לבטח (Yeshayahu 47:8), you who live in pleasure, dwelling secure. Of taste: מעדני-מלך (Bereishis 49:20), dainties fit for a king; ונחל עדניך תשקם (Tehillim 36:9), and You give them drink from the river of Your delights; מלא כרשו מעדני (Yirmiyahu 51:34), he has filled his belly with my delicacies. These too are meeting, and a relation: the sweetness and pleasure lie neither in the thing tasted or felt nor in the man who tastes or feels it, but in the meeting of the two in the sense of taste or touch that brings them together, and when they are sensed as suited to each other, pleasure comes of it.
עדי against עדן
All pleasantness comes from the suiting of the thing sensed to the sense, and that suiting works a pleasant feeling in the one who senses. So עדי and עדן are both the meeting of the thing sensed with the sense; but עדי is pleasantness as beauty, said of the pleasure of sight, and עדן is pleasantness as goodness, said of the pleasure of taste and touch. That is גן עדן, the Garden of Eden, which holds the pleasure of taste in its good fruits and the pleasure of touch in walking there, where the air is good and temperate.
מעד, to slip
The opposite of meeting with a thing is the verb מעד, made by adding a mem: ולא מעדו קרסלי (Tehillim 18:37), and my ankles did not slip; לא תמעד אשריו (Tehillim 37:31), his steps do not slip; ומתניהם תמיד המעד (Tehillim 69:24), and make their loins continually totter; ורגל מועדת (Mishlei 25:19), and a slipping foot. It is being removed from meeting the thing one should be joined to.
The mem that reverses a root
He gives it as a rule founded in the setting of the Hebrew language, to be kept in mind through the whole work: a two-letter root first set for meeting, joining, cleaving, agreement, binding and the like sometimes takes an added mem to mean the reverse of what it was set for. זח is moving off from being joined, as ולא יזח החשן (Shemos 28:28), and the breastplate shall not come loose, and מזח is its reverse. חק is engraving, מחק wiping out what was engraved. כר is recognizing, מכר the loss of recognition, estrangement. לט is folding, מלט ceasing to be folded. לץ is jesting, מליץ the reverse of jesting. נע is moving, מנע holding back from moving. סר is removing from, מסר handing over to. צא is going out of knowledge, מצא coming into it. רד is rule and dominion, מרד ceasing to be ruled. שך is nearness, משך the removing of nearness. So with מעד: עד is meeting, and מעד its reverse. The rule leaves out the mems that form a noun, as מקרא, a reading, מסע, a setting out, מרבה, an increase, מעשה, a deed, מעלה, an ascent, and מטה, a staff.
עד, witness: two unequal in a third
As a noun, עד is testimony, the joining of two subjects that are not equal in a third that brings them together; the verb, by contrast, joins two equals. The deed is one subject and its doer the second, and they are unequal, one doing and the other done; the one who sees them both is the third, in whom deed and doer are joined. So wherever the Torah says עד it means two (Sotah 2b): יבאהו עד (Shemos 22:12), let him bring it as evidence; להית עד חמס (Shemos 23:1), to be a malicious witness; ועד אין בה (Bamidbar 5:13), and there is no witness against her; unless the pasuk specifies אחד, one, as ועד אחד לא יענה בנפש למות (Bamidbar 35:30), one witness shall not testify against a person that he die. Rav Pappenheim finds this right by the setting of the word: עד is not the name of one person but of the event of meeting, the meeting of the deed and its doer in the knowledge of the third. Any seeing and knowing in which a doer and his deed meet, whether of one or of many, is called עד; as one testimony suffices whether the doers are one or many and the deeds one or more, so it makes no difference whether those who see and know are one or many.
Lifeless witnesses; עד against אות
By extension עדות is said of a thing without the breath of life: עד הגל הזה ועדה המצבה (Bereishis 31:52), this heap is witness and the pillar is witness, since here too two subjects meet in that third, which is to be a witness for them. But in full testimony the witness is one who can tell, while in testimony without life the witness is only a sign and token, to remind those who met in it to keep their terms. It is a little more than an אות, a sign: the אות is a sign to save from forgetting, the עד a sign to rouse to the deed, as והיה לאות ולעד (Yeshayahu 19:20), and it shall be for a sign and for a witness, and מה-אעידך מה אדמה-לך (Eichah 2:13), what shall I take to witness for you, what shall I liken to you, meaning what shall I set up as a witness that the like of you has happened before. Hence העידתי בכם היום את השמים ואת הארץ (Devarim 4:26), I call heaven and earth to witness against you this day, that they be like witnesses in the matter; as למען תהיה לי השירה הזאת לעד בבני ישראל (Devarim 31:19), so that this song may be a witness for Me among Bnei Yisrael.
עדות: mitzvos that bear witness
So some mitzvos are called עדות: אלה העדת והחקים (Devarim 4:45), these are the testimonies and the statutes; עדתיך נאמנו מאד (Tehillim 93:5), Your testimonies are very sure; אשרי נוצרי עדותיו (Tehillim 119:2), fortunate are those who keep His testimonies; הט לבי אל עדותיך (Tehillim 119:32 in his edition), incline my heart to Your testimonies. They are so called because they were given to be witnesses to the events that befell the people of Israel. With a cholam, the tav of עדות is the plural ending, testimonies; with a shuruk the word is the noun of the event, the Testimony: ארון העדות (Shemos 26:33), the Ark of the Testimony; לפני העדות למשמרת (Shemos 16:34), before the Testimony, to be kept.
עדות as warning
עדות serves too for warning, for which he gives the German, Warnung: a man makes his own words a witness to the thing he warns his fellow of, and those words are his witnesses afterwards that he warned him. So העד העד בנו האיש (Bereishis 43:3), the man solemnly warned us, that is, warned and cautioned us; רד העד בעם (Shemos 19:21), go down, warn the people; and והועד בבעליו (Shemos 21:29), and its owner has been warned. So הן עד לאומים נתתיו (Yeshayahu 55:4), behold, I have made him a witness to the peoples, meaning one who warns and cautions the nations to listen, and if they do not, בשלח יעבורו (Iyov 36:12), they shall perish by the sword. That fits only a ruler of nations: because he can punish, he can warn. So ויתן עליו את-הנזר ואת-העדות (Melachim II 11:12), and he put upon him the crown and the עדות, names the ornament the king wears as a sign that he is a witness to the nations; or עדות is from עדי, the ornaments of kingship, as the commentators explain.
Why the Torah is called עדות
Rav Pappenheim adds that perhaps the mitzvos called עדות have the name from warning too, and that it belongs to the prohibitions, all of which were stated with warning, caution and punishment, unlike the positive mitzvos, which carry no warning except Pesach and milah, which carry kares. And the Torah as a whole is called עדות, as in לוחות העדות (Shemos 31:18), the Tablets of the Testimony, and אהל העדות (Bamidbar 18:2), the Tent of the Testimony, because the core of the Torah is its לא תעשה, its prohibitions, which outnumber the positive mitzvos and are graver, and the Torah is named for the greater part.
תעודה, attestation
Another noun of the event from עדות is תעודה: וזאת התעודה בישראל (Rus 4:7), and this was the attestation in Yisrael, that is, doing a certain act is testimony that the dealing is concluded; צור תעודה חתום תורה בלמודי (Yeshayahu 8:16), bind up the testimony, seal the Torah among My disciples; and לתורה ולתעודה (Yeshayahu 8:20), to the Torah and to the testimony, that is, to testimony. The difference between עדות and תעודה he sets out at the root בן.
Rav Shlomo Pappenheim, Cheshek Shlomo (Shorashim), first printed from his manuscript by Moshe Tzuriel, Bnei Brak 5777. The English is our account of his entry.
Sources
Rabbi Reuven Chaim Klein, "Vayeitzei: Testify!," What's in a Word?, Ohr Somayach, 25 November 2023.
Cited in the essay: Bereishis 31:47; Bereishis 31:50 and Devarim 31:21 with Shadal; Bereishis 43:3; Shemos 19:21, 21:29, 26:33, 31:18; Bamidbar 18:2; Devarim 4:45, 6:17; Tehillim 20:3 with Rav Hirsch; Tehillim 93:5, 119:2, 119:31; Iyov 16:19 with Malbim; Yechezkel 7:7; Amos 4:13; Mishnah Bava Kamma 1:4, 2:4, 2:6, 3:8, 4:2, 4:5, 4:9; Yerushalmi Sotah 7:2 and Sanhedrin 10:1; Shabbos 115b; Megillah 9a; Menachem Ibn Saruk, Machberes Menachem, in the editions of Herschell Filipowsky and Ángel Sáenz-Badillo; Ibn Janach; Radak; Rabbi Shlomo Pappenheim, Yerios Shlomo and Cheshek Shlomo; Rabbi Shlomo Ibn Parchon, Machberes HeAruch; Rabbi Yehudah Aryeh of Carpentras, Ohalei Yehuda; Rabbi Shlomo Aharon Wertheimer; Rabbi Avraham Kobernick, Hipuch Osiyos; Shadal, Bikkurei Ittim (1829), pp. 194-196; a Damascus kesubah of 933 from the Cairo Genizah; Rabbi Yosef Kerman.