action

straying from a path

At a glance

זנותzenus
straying, promiscuity
breach of an owed loyalty; from ז-ן, sustenance (Rabbi Shlomo Pappenheim)
סטיהstiyah
deviation
off a marked path; sin in Tanach, samech in Chazal
סוטהsotah
the suspected wife
turned aside from fidelity

In short

Both roots denote deviating from a given path. Zonah literally refers to one who has strayed from a set of expectations. Idolatry and adultery both eschew an expected loyalty, to Hashem or to a spouse, which is why Tanach, especially Hoshea and Yechezkel, uses words of sexual deviance for theistic infidelity. Rabbi Shlomo Pappenheim derives zenus from ז-ן, the root of sustenance, since an over-abundance of food draws a person toward the physical and so to lustful desires. The word thus first named deviance from the sexual norm, and then came to mean deviance from any expectation, idol worship included. Stiyah is deviation from a specific track. Rabbi Klein traces the same root through sotah, satan, shoteh and ruach shtus, and Rabbi Moshe Shapiro relates shitah, the ordered approach, to it as its diametric opposite. Rabbi Aharon Marcus goes further, proposing that the letter tes by itself denotes movement to the side, so that chet, sin, is a straying.

Distinctions

Zenus (זנות)

Straying from the paths of righteousness can be understood as deviance from the proper path, as children who reject the Torah they were taught are colloquially "off the derech." Zonah, colloquially a prostitute, literally refers to one who has strayed from a certain set of expectations. A zonah whom a kohen may not marry (Vayikra 21:7) is, for that issur, any woman who had relations with someone forbidden to her. Near Moshe's death Hashem tells him that the people will stray after foreign gods (Devarim 31:16), and the word for their straying is from this root. Idolatry and adultery are conceptually similar in that both eschew an expected loyalty, one to Hashem and one to a spouse, which is why Tanach, especially Hoshea and Yechezkel, uses words of sexual deviance to describe theistic infidelity.

Rabbi Shlomo Pappenheim of Breslau (1740 to 1814) traces zenus, promiscuity, to the biliteral ז-ן, the nucleus of the words for sustenance: in bentching Hashem is He who sustains (zan) all of Creation, and mazon, food, is essential to sustaining life. He proposes that an over-abundance of mazon, a very physical substance, draws a person toward wholly physical endeavors, and this leads to lustful desires. Excess physical energy generally finds its outlet in strenuous activity (work, exercise, or Torah study); one who does not avail himself of such outlets enters dangerous territory, as the Gemara warns that inactivity leads to sexual misconduct (Kesubos 59b). This is the link between sexual deviance and sustenance. Once zenus named deviance from the sexual norm, it came to mean deviance from any expectation, and could apply to idol worship as well.

Stiyah (סטיה)

Spelled with a sin in Tanach, with a samech in Rabbinic works. The sotah is the wife suspected of having deviated from the path of fidelity. The satan is an adversary who impedes a person from continuing on a given path. A shoteh is a mentally incompetent person, whose erratic conduct is unpredictable and follows no specific path, and the word also covers the irregular: a bechor shoteh or bechor satan, a firstborn to his mother but not to his father (Yevamos 16b), and a hadas shoteh, a myrtle that deviates from the norm in not having three leaves growing together (see Succah 32b). The Gemara says a person sins only if a ruach shtus, a spirit of deviance, has entered him (Sotah 3a). From all of these Rabbi Klein concludes that the root ס/ש-ט refers to straying from a specific track.

Rabbi Moshe Shapiro (1935 to 2017) explains that shitah, a systematized and ordered approach (commonly an opinion in a Talmudic discussion), is also related to stiyah, and denotes its thematic diametric opposite: the systematized path against the one who deviates from it. Rabbi Klein calls this yet another example of a uniquely Hebrew phenomenon, in which words of polar opposite meaning are related in their roots. Rabbi Shapiro also relates the place name Shittim, where the people strayed after the women of Moav (Bamidbar 25:1), to stiyah.

The letter tes as a root

Rabbi Aharon Marcus (1843 to 1916) proposes what Rabbi Klein calls a wildly innovative idea: an individual letter, beyond making up roots, can sometimes itself be a root uniting the words that use it. The letter tes denotes movement to the side, that is, straying, as shown by stiyah (deviation), natah (incline), titah (turn aside), tata (broom), tach (plastering), taah (erred), and more. Most significantly, he argues that the active letter of chet, sin, is its middle tes, so that to sin is to move to the side, off the proper path. He adds that avon is related to ivvus, warped, the sinner being on a warped or contorted path, and pesha to posea, takes a step, the sinner having taken steps in the wrong direction.

Also discussed in

  • Foodמזון / זנות (ז-ן)

Radak on this root

Sefer HaShorashim

ז-נ-ה

To play the harlot, said of a woman, of a people going after foreign gods, and of the heart and the eyes; and to make another play the harlot.

Playing the harlot

כִּי זָֽנְתָה אִמָּם (Hoshea 2:7), for their mother played the harlot; וְאַתְּ זָנִית רֵעִים רַבִּים (Yirmiyahu 3:1), and you played the harlot with many companions; וַתִּזְנִים וְגַם לֹא שָׂבָֽעַתְּ (Yechezkel 16:28), where he glosses וַתִּזְנִים as ותזני עמם, and you played the harlot with them, and still you were not sated. Of the heart and the eyes, אֶת־לִבָּם הַזּוֹנֶה and וְאֵת עֵֽינֵיהֶם הַזֹּנוֹת (Yechezkel 6:9), their heart that plays the harlot and their eyes that play the harlot.

The forgotten harlot

וְזָֽנְתָה אֶת־כָּל־מַמְלְכוֹת הָאָרֶץ (Yeshayahu 23:17), and she shall play the harlot with all the kingdoms of the earth: the pasuk had likened her, once the merchants ceased from her, to a forgotten harlot, and says that she will again come to her hire; that is, all the kingdoms will trade with her.

The nouns it makes

זְנוּת וְיַיִן וְתִירוֹשׁ (Hoshea 4:11), harlotry and wine and new wine, with its plural in וְנָֽשְׂאוּ אֶת־זְנֽוּתֵיכֶם (Bamidbar 14:33), and they shall bear your harlotries. With a tav added at the start, וַיִּשְׁפְּכוּ תַזְנוּתָם עָלֶֽיהָ (Yechezkel 23:8), they poured out their harlotry upon her. With a nun added in place of the tav, מֵרֹב זְנוּנֵי זוֹנָה (Nachum 3:4), from the many harlotries of the harlot; or else זנונים doubles the middle root letter of זנה, as הגיגי, my meditation, does of הגה.

Where it takes an object

הִזְנוּ וְלֹא יִפְרֹצוּ (Hoshea 4:10), they played the harlot and shall not increase, stands without an object; but אַל־תְּחַלֵּל אֶֽת־בִּתְּךָ לְהַזְנוֹתָהּ (Vayikra 19:29), do not profane your daughter to make her a harlot, and וַיֶּזֶן אֶת־יֹֽשְׁבֵי יְרֽוּשָׁלַם (Divrei HaYamim II 21:11), he made the dwellers of Yerushalayim play the harlot, take one.

וְזָנָה אַֽחֲרֵי אֱלֹהֵי נֵֽכַר־הָאָרֶץ (דברים לא, טז), כִּי זָֽנְתָה אִמָּם (הושע ב, ז), וְאַתְּ זָנִית רֵעִים רַבִּים (ירמיה ג, א), הִצְמַתָּה כָּל־זוֹנֶה מִמֶּֽךָּ (תהלים עג, כז), וַתִּזְנִים וְגַם לֹא שָׂבָֽעַתְּ (יחזקאל טז, כח), פירוש ותזני עמם, אֶת־לִבָּם הַזּוֹנֶה (יחזקאל ו, ט), וְאֵת עֵֽינֵיהֶם הַזֹּנוֹת (יחזקאל ו, ט), וְזָֽנְתָה אֶת־כָּל־מַמְלְכוֹת הָאָרֶץ (ישעיה כג, יז) לפי שהמשילה בהתבטל הסוחרים ממנה לזונה נשכחה אמר שחשוב עוד לאתננה וְזָֽנְתָה אֶת־כָּל־מַמְלְכוֹת הָאָרֶץ כלומר שיסחרו אותה כל הממלכות. בִּזְנוֹתֵךְ אַֽחֲרֵי גוֹיִם (יחזקאל כג, ל), וַתִּזְנֶה עָלָיו פִּֽילַגְשׁוֹ (שופטים יט, ב). והתאר לנקבה וְהוּא בֶּן־אִשָּׁה זוֹנָה (שופטים יא, א). והשם זְנוּת וְיַיִן וְתִירוֹשׁ (הושע ד, יא). והקבוץ בסימן אחד וְנָֽשְׂאוּ אֶת־זְנֽוּתֵיכֶם (במדבר יד, לג), בִּזְנוּתַיִךְ וּבְרָעָתֵֽךְ (ירמיה ג, ב). ובתוספת תי"ו בתחילה וַיִּשְׁפְּכוּ תַזְנוּתָם עָלֶֽיהָ (יחזקאל כג, ח). והקבוץ וְאֶת־תַּזְנוּתֶיהָ מִמִּצְרַיִם לֹא עָזָבָה (שם). ובתוספת נו"ן תחת התי"ו מֵרֹב זְנוּנֵי זוֹנָה (נחום ג, ד), הַמֹּכֶרֶת גּוֹיִם בִּזְנוּנֶיהָ (שם), וְנִגְלָה עֶרְוַת זְנוּנַיִךְ (יחזקאל כג, כט). או נכפל בו עי"ן הפועל כמו מן הגה הגיגי כן מן זנה זנונים. והפעל הנוסף [הִפְעִיל] כִּי עַתָּה הִזְנֵיתָ אֶפְרַיִם נִטְמָא יִשְׂרָאֵֽל (הושע ה, ג), הִזְנוּ וְלֹא יִפְרֹצוּ (הושע ד, י), הַזְנֵה הִזְנוּ (הושע ד, יח), והם עומדים. והיוצאים אַל־תְּחַלֵּל אֶֽת־בִּתְּךָ לְהַזְנוֹתָהּ (ויקרא יט, כט). וַיֶּזֶן אֶת־יֹֽשְׁבֵי יְרֽוּשָׁלַם (דברי הימים ב' כא, יא). והפעל שלא נזכר פועלו מן הכבד הדגוש [פֻּעַל] וְאַֽחֲרַיִךְ לֹא זוּנָּה (יחזקאל טז, לד), נכתבה בו הו"ו עם הדגש.

Radak, Sefer HaShorashim, Berlin 1847. Public domain, digitised by Sefaria from the National Library of Israel.

Sources

Rabbi Reuven Chaim Klein, "Straying from the Path," What's in a Word?, Ohr Somayach, 8 September 2018.

Cited in the essay: Vayikra 21:7; Bamidbar 25:1; Devarim 31:16; Kesubos 59b; Yevamos 16b; Succah 32b; Sotah 3a; Rabbi Shlomo Pappenheim, Cheshek Shlomo s.v. זן; Rabbi Moshe Shapiro; Rabbi Aharon Marcus.