society

stranger

At a glance

זרzar
outsider, stranger
strange in one respect only, often a fellow Jew (Malbim, Ibn Ezra); the non-Kohen
נכריnachri
foreigner
wholly foreign, from another nation (Ibn Ezra, Malbim); tied to recognition, lehakir (Pappenheim)
חילוניchiloni
stranger, non-Kohen
Aramaic for zar (Onkelos); a non-Kohen in the Midrash; modern: a secular Jew
הדיוטhedyot
commoner, layman
Greek loanword; commoner against leader, amateur against craftsman, Kohen hedyot against Kohen Gadol

In short

Zar and nachri both mean "stranger," and it seems from most of the commentators that they measure different distances. A zar is estranged in one respect, and often comes from the same nation or locality: an outsider, a stranger. A nachri is a complete foreigner, strange in many ways, from another nation entirely. On Malbim's reading, the nachri is more unfamiliar than the zar. Rabbi Shlomo Pappenheim dissents, holding the two equally estranged and differing only in what their roots fix on. In Kodashim contexts zar is a technical term, the non-Kohen. Chiloni is often the Targumim's Aramaic for zar, and it is the Midrash's word for a non-Kohen. Hedyot, a Greek loanword, is a commoner or layman: the ordinary man as distinct from the leader, the amateur as distinct from the craftsman, and, in Kohen hedyot, the ordinary Kohen as distinct from the Kohen Gadol.

Distinctions

Zar (זר)

  • Ibn Ezra (long commentary to Shemos 21:2): zar implies someone of the speaker's own nation but a different tribe within it. The same understanding can be gleaned from the Vilna Gaon's comments to Mishlei 27:2.
  • Malbim: a zar is from the familiar locality but counts as strange with respect to some particular behavior or habit, strange in one way only, while the nachri is strange in many ways at once.

(Rabbi Klein adds an aside: he used to think English bizarre was related to zar, but the Oxford English Dictionary feels otherwise.)

Malbim's own illustrations carry the point. A non-Kohen is a zar toward terumah and the korbanos he may not eat (Vayikra 22:10, 22:12-13), yet he is plainly no total stranger. A man other than a married woman's husband is a zar to her (Devarim 25:5, Yechezkel 16:32) because she is forbidden to him, even if he is not a complete stranger. Mamzer is said to be related to zar (Yevamos 76b), which, Rabbi Klein notes, makes sense given Malbim's understanding: a mamzer is a full Jew, foreign only as regards marrying into unblemished lineage. He is therefore termed a zar and not a nachri.

Rabbi Klein applies the same reasoning to a Gemara. Tehillim 81:10 pairs el zar with el nechar, yet Shabbos 105b seemingly declines to read the first clause in its literal sense as outlawing foreign gods, and applies el zar to the yetzer hara. The forced explanation presumably stems from the word zar: from a Jewish perspective no "other god" could be anything but wholly foreign, so zar would have no place. The yetzer hara, on the other hand, is intimate (it rests within a person) and foreign (it goes against everything the Torah stands for) at once.

Rabbi Shlomo Pappenheim of Breslau (1740 to 1814) traces zar to the two-letter ז-ר, "estrangement, disconnection": the stranger is cut off from the society he finds himself in.

Nachri (נכרי)

  • Ibn Ezra: from an entirely different nation.
  • Rabbi Shlomo Aharon Wertheimer (1866 to 1935) points out that nachri is in several places used to mean the opposite of a relative (Bereishis 31:15, Devarim 23:21).
  • Malbim: a complete foreigner, from another land and another people, strange in many ways at once.

Rabbi Yaakov Tzvi Mecklenburg (1785 to 1865): the root נ-כ-ר bears opposite senses, "recognizing" (makir, lehakir) and "not recognizing" (nachri), and a verb of the same root means to deny or repudiate (Devarim 32:27, Iyov 21:29). This is why the Mechilta (to Shemos 12:43) defines ben-neichar as any heretic who denies Hashem, Jew or not.

Rabbi Shlomo Pappenheim holds that nachri and zar denote the same degree of estrangement and differ only in what their roots fix on. Nachri is tied to lehakir, recognition: meeting a nachri, one has no ready mental picture of him, and so feels the pull to find out who he is. Zar fixes on his disconnection from the society around him. One and the same man can be called both, depending which aspect is in view.

Mishlei (2:16, 5:20, 7:5) likens foreign wisdoms to a zarah and a nachriah.

  • Sefer Chassidim 619: the nachriah is a non-Jewish woman, the zarah a Jewish one.
  • Malbim reads the two as two kinds of wisdom: the zarah is a discipline outside Torah that a man may nonetheless press into Torah's service, as he could marry that woman were the procedure right; the nachriah is a wisdom that can never enhance Torah, as a Jew may never marry a non-Jewish woman, its heresies staying irreconcilable.

Chiloni (חילוני)

The Targumim often render Hebrew zar into Aramaic as chiloni (Onkelos to Shemos 29:33, 30:33; Peirush Yonatan to Targum Yonatan to Bereishis 42:7), and nachri as nochrae (Targum to Devarim 17:15, Shmuel II 15:19, Mishlei 27:2); as an aside, the Targum to Tehillim (81:10, 137:4) reverses the trend. Either way chiloni denotes foreignness or strangeness just as zar and nachri do (see Yair to Devarim 25:5 and Me'at Tzari to Bamidbar 1:51).

The Midrash (Vayikra Rabbah 24:7) uses chiloni the way Scripture uses zar, of a non-Kohen. The Midrash explains that the Torah commands all Jews to "be holy" (Vayikra 19:2) because if they want to walk with Hashem they must live up to His standards, and illustrates it with a parable: a Kohen Gadol meets a chiloni on the road who asks to walk with him, and is told that a Kohen keeps to ritually pure paths and does not pass through cemeteries; join me at that standard or I walk alone. In Modern Hebrew chiloni is a secular Jew, likewise estranged, failing to live at the standard of the rest of the nation.

Hedyot (הדיוט)

Frequent in the Mishnah in three senses: a commoner against the political or spiritual leadership (Nedarim 5:5, Sanhedrin 7:10, Horayos 3:2-3); an ordinary non-professional against a skilled craftsman (Moed Katan 1:8, Bava Metzia 4:4, Keilim 26:1); and as a modifier, Kohen hedyot, the ordinary Kohen against the Kohen Gadol (Yoma 7:5, Yevamos 2:4, Sotah 8:3). A Greek loanword, from the word that also gave English "idiot."

Also discussed in

Radak on these roots

Sefer HaShorashim

ז-ו-ר

To press; a blow is called מָזוֹר because it is pressed, and so is its healing. Another sense, near the first, is to sneeze; another, to be strange or estranged.

Pressing

וַיָּזַר אֶת־הַגִּזָּה (Shoftim 6:38), he pressed the fleece; וַתִּשְׁכַּח כִּי־רֶגֶל תְּזוּרֶהָ (Iyov 39:15), and she forgets that a foot may press it; וְהַזּוּרֶה תִּבָּקַע אֶפְעֶֽה (Yeshayahu 59:5), and the pressed one splits open into a viper, where the segol stands in place of a kamatz. Of it he says ענין מעיכה ידוע, the sense of pressing is known.

Whether זֹרוּ is passive

לֹא־ זֹרוּ וְלֹא חֻבָּשׁוּ (Yeshayahu 1:6), they were not pressed and not bound up: on the view of Rabbi Yehudah the grammarian it is a form whose doer is not named. In Radak's own view it is a past verb standing without an object, on the pattern of מַה־טֹּבוּ אֹֽהָלֶיךָ יַֽעֲקֹב (Bamidbar 24:5), how goodly are your tents, Yaakov; and though this root takes an object in the light form, so we find אָז הָֽלְמוּ עִקְּבֵי־סוּס (Shoftim 5:22), then the horses' hooves hammered, standing without one beside הֲלָמוּנִי בַּל־יָדָעְתִּי (Mishlei 23:35), they struck me, I did not know it, which takes one. On זֹרוּ רְשָׁעִים מֵרָחֶם (Tehillim 58:4), the wicked are estranged from the womb, he says it may be a light past or, on Rabbi Yonah's view, a form whose doer is not named.

מָזוֹר, the wound and the cure

A blow is called מָזוֹר because it is pressed: וְלֹֽא־יִגְהֶה מִכֶּם מָזֽוֹר (Hoshea 5:13), and he will not heal the wound from you, and וַיַּרְא אֶפְרַיִם אֶת־חָלְיוֹ וִֽיהוּדָה אֶת־ מְזֹרוֹ (Hoshea 5:13), Efrayim saw his sickness and Yehudah his wound. The healing is called מָזוֹר too, since healing comes by pressing the wound, as לֹא־ זֹרוּ וְלֹא חֻבָּשׁוּ (Yeshayahu 1:6), they were not pressed and not bound up, and אֵֽין־דָּן דִּינֵךְ לְמָזוֹר (Yirmiyahu 30:13), none judges your cause for healing.

Sneezing

וַיְזוֹרֵר הַנַּעַר (Melachim II 4:35), the lad sneezed, which he gives in the vernacular, and the Targum of עֲטִישֹׁתָיו תָּהֶל אוֹר (Iyov 41:10), his sneezes flash forth light, is זְרִירוֹי, his sneezes. This too is near the first sense, since a man in sneezing presses himself.

Strange and estranged

רוּחִֽי זָרָה לְאִשְׁתִּי (Iyov 19:17), my spirit is strange to my wife; לֹא־ זָרוּ מִתַּֽאֲוָתָם (Tehillim 78:30), they were not estranged from their craving; לְאִישׁ זָר (Vayikra 22:12), to a strange man; מוּזָר הָיִיתִי לְאֶחָי (Tehillim 69:9), I became a stranger to my brothers; נָזֹרוּ אָחֽוֹר (Yeshayahu 1:4), they are estranged, gone backward; and וְהָיָה לָכֶם לְזָרָא (Bamidbar 11:20), and it will be a thing estranged to you, where the alef stands in place of a heh. All of these are ענין התנכרות וזרות, a sense of estrangement and strangeness.

Strange waters, strange men

מַיִם זָרִים קָרִים נוֹזְלִֽים (Yirmiyahu 18:14), strange waters, cold and flowing, are waters coming from a strange and distant place, as though strangers to the place they flow in. כְּמַהְפֵּכַת זָרִֽים (Yeshayahu 1:7) is the overturning by strange men from a far land, who when they come on a city and take it overturn and destroy everything, having no mind to stay in it, which neighbours do not do. In וְשִׁלַּחְתִּי לְבָבֶל זָרִים וְזֵרוּהָ (Yirmiyahu 51:2), I will send strangers to Bavel and they will scatter her, one word plays on the other, וְזֵרוּהָ being from זְרֵה ־הָלְאָה (Bamidbar 17:2), scatter afar, and of that root; though it may be of this root, and then: I will send foreigners to Bavel and they will make her a stranger in all she has, taking everything and plundering her.

וַתִּשְׁכַּח כִּי־רֶגֶל תְּזוּרֶהָ (איוב לט, טו), וַיָּזַר אֶת־הַגִּזָּה (שופטים ו, לח), וְהַזּוּרֶה תִּבָּקַע אֶפְעֶֽה (ישעיה נט, ה), והסגול מקום קמץ. ושלא נזכר פועלו ממנו [פֻּעַל] לֹא־זֹרוּ וְלֹא חֻבָּשׁוּ (ישעיה א, ו), על דעת רבי יהודה המדקדק. ועל דעתי הוא פועל עבר לגזרה פעול בפלס מַה־טֹּבוּ אֹֽהָלֶיךָ יַֽעֲקֹב (במדבר כד, ה), ויהיה פעל עומד ואף על פי שהוא עובר בבנין הקל הנה מצאנו אָז הָֽלְמוּ עִקְּבֵי־סוּס (שופטים ה, כב), בודד הֲלָמוּנִי בַּל־יָדָעְתִּי (משלי כג, לה), עובר, ענין מעיכה ידוע. ונקראת המכה לפי שיזורו אותה מָזוֹר, וְלֹֽא־יִגְהֶה מִכֶּם מָזֽוֹר (הושע ה, יג), לַחְמְךָ יָשִׂימוּ מָזוֹר (עבדיה א, ז), וַיַּרְא אֶפְרַיִם אֶת־חָלְיוֹ וִֽיהוּדָה אֶת־מְזֹרוֹ (הושע ה, יג). וגם נאמר על הרפואה מזור לפי שהרפואה תבא על ידי הזרת המכה כמו שאמר לֹא־זֹרוּ וְלֹא חֻבָּשׁוּ (ישעיה א, ו), אֵֽין־דָּן דִּינֵךְ לְמָזוֹר רְפֻאוֹת תְּעָלָה אֵין לָֽךְ (ירמיה ל, יג). וענין אחר וַיְזוֹרֵר הַנַּעַר (מלכים ב' ד, לה), אשטרונד"ר בלע"ז [שטרנוד"ר], ותרגום עֲטִישֹׁתָיו תָּהֶל אוֹר (איוב מא, י) זְרִירוֹי. וגם זה הענין קרוב לענין ראשון כי בהתעטש האדם יזור עצמו. וענין אחר לֹא־זָרוּ מִתַּֽאֲוָתָם (תהלים עח, ל), רוּחִֽי זָרָה לְאִשְׁתִּי (איוב יט, יז). זֹרוּ רְשָׁעִים מֵרָחֶם (תהלים נח, ד), אפשר שהוא מהפעל הקל לגזרת פעול או יהיה מאשר לא נזכר פועלו לדעת רבי יונה. והשם וְהָיָה לָכֶם לְזָרָא (במדבר יא, כ), ובשקל צָרָה, רָעָה והאל"ף מקום ה"א. ועוד נכתבו בשרש זרה. והפעול מבנין הִפְעִיל מוּזָר הָיִיתִי לְאֶחָי (תהלים סט, ט). והנפעל אֲשֶׁר נָזֹרוּ מֵֽעָלַי בְּגִלּֽוּלֵיהֶם כֻּלָּֽם (יחזקאל יד, ה), נָזֹרוּ אָחֽוֹר (ישעיה א, ד), והתאר לְאִישׁ זָר (ויקרא כב, יב), וְזָרִים לֹא־יַֽעַבְרוּ־בָהּ (יואל ד, יז), מַיִם זָרִים קָרִים נוֹזְלִֽים (ירמיה יח, יד), וְשִׁלַּחְתִּי לְבָבֶל זָרִים וְזֵרוּהָ (ירמיה נא, ב), לשון נופל על הלשון כי וְזֵרוּהָ מענין זְרֵה־הָלְאָה (במדבר יז, ב), ומשרשו. ויתכן היות וְזֵרוּהָ מענין זרים ומשרשו מן הקל לגזרת פָּעֵל. ופירושו וְשִׁלַּחְתִּי לְבָבֶל נכרים ויעשוה כנכריה בכל אשר לה כי יקחו הכל ויבזו אותה. ועוד נפרשו בשרש זָרָה, כל אלו ענין התנכרות וזרות. ופירוש מַיִם זָרִים באים ממקום זר ורחוק כאילו הם זרים אל המקום אשר נוזלים שם. כְּמַהְפֵּכַת זָרִֽים (ישעיה א, ז), פירוש כמהפכת אנשים זרים מארץ רחוקה כשיבאו על עיר וילכדוה יהפכו וישחיתו הכל כי אין דעתם לעמד בה והקרובים אינם עושים כן ועוד נכתבו בשרש זרם.

נ-כ-ר

To recognize. A second sense, its opposite: denial and strangeness, and from it נֵכָר and נָכְרִי, the foreign. A third: to hand over.

Recognizing

וְלֹא נִכַּר ־שׁוֹעַ לִפְנֵי־דָל (Iyov 34:19), and the noble is not recognized before the poor; לֹא נִכְּרוּ בַּחוּצוֹת (Eichah 4:8), they were not recognized in the streets. וְלֹא הִכִּירוֹ כִּֽי־הָיוּ יָדָיו (Bereishis 27:23), he did not recognize him because his hands were so; וְאֵינָם מַכִּירִים לְדַבֵּר יְהוּדִית (Nechemiah 13:24), they did not know how to speak Yehudis; לֹֽא־ תַכִּירוּ פָנִים בַּמִּשְׁפָּט (Devarim 1:17), you shall not recognize faces in judgment, and הַֽכֵּר ־פָּנִים לֹֽא־טוֹב (Mishlei 28:21), recognizing faces is not good. The noun is הַכָּרַת פְּנֵיהֶם עָנְתָה בָּם (Yeshayahu 3:9), the recognition of their faces testifies against them. Of all this he says ענין ההכרה ידוע, the sense of recognizing is known.

The lad and his doings

גַּם בְּמַֽעֲלָלָיו יִתְנַכֶּר ־נָעַר (Mishlei 20:11), even by his doings a lad makes himself known, stands among the forms of recognizing. His father explained it as the reverse of recognizing, which Radak spells out: by his doings the lad makes himself a stranger, for if what he does is clean and upright, people say this is no lad's doing.

Denial and strangeness

The second sense, the opposite of the first: בְּיוֹם נָכְרוֹ (Ovadiah 1:12), on the day of his estrangement, an infinitive; וַֽיְנַכְּרוּ אֶת־הַמָּקוֹם הַזֶּה (Yirmiyahu 19:4), they made this place strange; פֶּן־ יְנַכְּרוּ צָרֵימוֹ (Devarim 32:27), lest their foes deny it; וַיִּתְנַכֵּר אֲלֵיהֶם (Bereishis 42:7), he made himself a stranger to them; וְהִיא מִתְנַכֵּרָֽה (Melachim I 14:5), and she was making herself a stranger. The sense is ענין ההכחשה והזרות, denial and strangeness.

The foreigner

From this sense, the adjective: כָּל־בֶּן־ נֵכָר (Shemos 12:43), any foreigner; אֱלֹהֵי נֵֽכַר ־הָאָרֶץ (Devarim 31:16), the gods of the foreigners of the land; and with a yud, אִישׁ נָכְרִי (Devarim 17:15), a foreign man, מַלְבּוּשׁ נָכְרִֽי (Tzefaniah 1:8), foreign clothing, הֲלוֹא נָכְרִיּוֹת נֶחְשַׁבְנוּ לוֹ (Bereishis 31:15), are we not reckoned to him as strangers. The right account, he holds, is that נֶכֶר is both a noun and an adjective: in לְאֵל נֵכָֽר (Tehillim 81:10), to a foreign god, it is an adjective, and so in כָּל־בֶּן־נֵכָר; those upon which the construct falls are nouns, as וּבְנֵי הַנֵּכָר (Yeshayahu 56:5 in his edition), and the sons of the foreigner, and אֱלֹהֵי הַנֵּכָר (Bereishis 35:2), the gods of the foreigner.

A third sense, handing over

נִכַּר אֹתוֹ אֱלֹהִים בְּיָדִי (Shmuel I 23:7), Elokim has handed him over into my hand, which he glosses מסר והסגיר, gave him over and delivered him up.

וְלֹא נִכַּר־שׁוֹעַ לִפְנֵי־דָל (איוב לד, יט), הוא נפעל. וכן לֹא נִכְּרוּ בַּחוּצוֹת (איכה ד, ח). וההתפעל גַּם בְּמַֽעֲלָלָיו יִתְנַכֶּר־נָעַר (משלי כ, יא). ואדוני אבי ז"ל פירשו בהפך ההכרה כלומר הנער במעלליו יתנכר שאם פעלו זך וישר אומרים אין זה מעשה נער. והכבד [הִפְעִיל] וְלֹא הִכִּירוֹ כִּֽי־הָיוּ יָדָיו (בראשית כז, כג), וְהֵמָּה הִכִּירוּ אֶת־קוֹל הַנַּעַר הַלֵּוִי (שופטים יח, ג), ואין לי מַכִּיר (תהלים קמב, ה), וְאֵינָם מַכִּירִים לְדַבֵּר יְהוּדִית (נחמיה יג, כד), לֹֽא־תַכִּירוּ פָנִים בַּמִּשְׁפָּט (דברים א, יז), וַיַּכֵּר יְהוּדָה (בראשית לח, כו), הַֽכֵּר־פָּנִים לֹֽא־טוֹב (משלי כח, כא), וְיִשְׂרָאֵל לֹא יַכִּירָנוּ (ישעיה סג, טז), קמוץ ומשפטו צירי. נֶגֶד אַחֵינוּ הַֽכֶּר־לְךָ (בראשית לא, לב). והתאר אִישׁ מֵאֵת מַכָּרוֹ (מלכים ב' יב, ו), מֵאֵת מַכָּֽרֵיכֶם (מלכים ב' ב' יב,. והשם הַכָּרַת פְּנֵיהֶם עָנְתָה בָּם (ישעיה ג, ט). ענין ההכרה ידוע. וענין אחר בְּיוֹם נָכְרוֹ (עבדיה א, יב), והוא מקור. וההתפעל בִּשְׂפָתָו [בִּשְׂפָתָיו] יִנָּכֵר שׂוֹנֵא (משלי כו, כד). והכבד [פִּעֵל] וַֽיְנַכְּרוּ אֶת־הַמָּקוֹם הַזֶּה (ירמיה יט, ד), פֶּן־יְנַכְּרוּ צָרֵימוֹ (דברים לב, כז), וְאֹתֹתָם לֹא תְנַכֵּֽרוּ (איוב כא, כט). וההתפעל וְהִיא מִתְנַכֵּרָֽה (מלכים א' יד, ה), וַיִּתְנַכֵּר אֲלֵיהֶם (בראשית מב, ז), ענין ההכחשה והזרות. והענין הזה הפך הענין הראשון. והתאר מזה הענין כָּל־בֶּן־נֵכָר (שמות יב, מג), אֱלֹהֵי נֵֽכַר־הָאָרֶץ (דברים לא, טז). וביו"ד אִישׁ נָכְרִי (דברים יז, טו), מַלְבּוּשׁ נָכְרִֽי (צפניה א, ח), וְנָכְרִים בָּאוּ שְׁעָרָו [שְׁעָרָיו] (עבדיה א, יא), מִנָּכְרִיָּה אֲמָרֶיהָ הֶֽחֱלִֽיקָה (משלי ב, טז), נָכְרִיָּה עֲבֹדָתֽוֹ (ישעיה כח, כא), הֲלוֹא נָכְרִיּוֹת נֶחְשַׁבְנוּ לוֹ (בראשית לא, טו). והשם וְנֶכֶר לְפֹֽעֲלֵי אָֽוֶן (איוב לא, ג) בשש נקדות. ואם יהיה בְּיוֹם נָכְרוֹ שם יהיה משקל אחר. וענין אחר נִכַּר אֹתוֹ אֱלֹהִים בְּיָדִי (שמואל א' כג, ז), פירוש מסר והסגיר. והנכון להיות נֶכֶר שם ותאר כי לְאֵל נֵכָֽר (תהלים פא, י), תאר. וכן כָּל־בֶּן־נֵכָר. ואותם שבא הסמיכות עליהם יהיו שם כמו וּבְנֵי הַנֵּכָר (ישעיה נו, ה), וּבְנֵי נֵכָר (ישעיה סא, ה), אֱלֹהֵי הַנֵּכָר (בראשית לה, ב), אֱלֹהֵי נֵֽכַר־הָאָרֶץ (דברים לא, טז).

Radak, Sefer HaShorashim, Berlin 1847. Public domain, digitised by Sefaria from the National Library of Israel.

Sources

Rabbi Reuven Chaim Klein, "Strange Aliens," What's in a Word?, Ohr Somayach, 1 May 2021.

Cited in the essay: Bereishis 31:15, 42:7; Shemos 12:43, 21:2, 29:33, 30:33; Vayikra 19:2, 22:10, 22:12-13; Devarim 17:15, 23:21, 25:5, 32:27; Shmuel II 15:19; Yeshayahu 28:21, 61:5; Yechezkel 16:32; Ovadiah 1:11; Tehillim 81:10, 137:4; Mishlei 2:16, 5:20, 7:5, 27:2; Iyov 21:29; Mishnah Nedarim 5:5, Sanhedrin 7:10, Horayos 3:2-3, Moed Katan 1:8, Bava Metzia 4:4, Keilim 26:1, Yoma 7:5, Yevamos 2:4, Sotah 8:3; Shabbos 105b; Yevamos 76b; the Mechilta to Shemos 12:43; Vayikra Rabbah 24:7; Ibn Ezra, long commentary to Shemos 21:2; the Vilna Gaon to Mishlei 27:2; Malbim, Sefer HaCarmel s.v. זר נכרי and ממזר; Rabbi Shlomo Pappenheim, Cheshek Shlomo s.v. כר; Rabbi Shlomo Aharon Wertheimer, Beiurei Shemos Nirdafim s.v. גר/גר תושב /גר בש and / גר אשר בארצך / נכרי; Rabbi Yaakov Tzvi Mecklenburg, HaKsav VeHaKabbalah to Shemos 12:43; Sefer Chassidim 619; Onkelos to Shemos 29:33 and 30:33; Targum to Devarim 17:15, Shmuel II 15:19, Mishlei 27:2 and Tehillim 81:10, 137:4; Peirush Yonatan to Targum Yonatan to Bereishis 42:7; Yair to Devarim 25:5; Me'at Tzari to Bamidbar 1:51; the Oxford English Dictionary.