nature

balsam

At a glance

פנגpanag
balsam oil (disputed)
disputed hapax: balsam oil (Rashi) against pinuk, pleasure (Tedeschi-Ashkenazi)
צריtzari
balm, balsam
the balsam (Rambam) or theriaca (Rashi)
נטףnataf
the dripping one
the incense passage's name for tzari: sap that drips from the tree
קטףketaf
balsam tree
the tree tzari drips from; the balsam tree (Rambam); Onkelos's word for tzari
בלסםbalsam
balsam
the Rabbinic word from Greek balsamon (Bereishis Rabbah)
בושםbosem
fragrance, spices
the wide word for fragrant goods, never balsam in Tanach
אפרסמוןafarsemon
balsam oil
the commonest Rabbinic word for balsam oil; the foremost oil (Rashi)
אפופלסמוןopopalsamun
balsam
a third Rabbinic term, from Greek opobalsamum, flowing fragrant

In short

For Rambam and Bereishis Rabbah, the tzari of Tanach and of the ketores is balm or balsam; Rashi explains it as theriaca. In the Torah's incense passage the same ingredient is called nataf, literally the dripping one. Bosem/besamim is the general word, fragrance, spices, and in Tanach it never means balsam in particular. Afarsemon is the commonest Rabbinic word for balsam oil. Panag is a hapax legomenon at Yechezkel 27:17. Yossiphon reads it as balsam, and Rashi cites that, presumably endorsing it; but Radak objects that if tzari is balsam, panag is unlikely to be, since Yechezkel lists the two separately.

Distinctions

Balsam is a sweet-smelling oil once bound up with Eretz Yisrael. The exact plant is not known today, though some identify it as Commiphora gileadensis, a shrub native to the land; in ancient times it was famous.

Panag (פנג)

One occurrence, Yechezkel 27:17, among the goods Tyre bought from Eretz Yisrael: wheat of Minis, panag, honey, oil and tzari. Neither the word nor its root פ-נ-ג occurs anywhere else, so its sense is not readily recoverable. Yossiphon (I ch. 38), which calls Yericho Ir HaReiach, the City of Scent, for its balsam groves, says outright that balsam oil is also called panag oil; Rashi cites this (to Yechezkel 27:17, Melachim II 20:13, Yeshayahu 39:2, Berachos 43a), presumably endorsing it, and it is also cited by the French exegetes Rabbi Yosef Kara and Rabbi Eliezer of Beaugency, and by Radak (to Yechezkel there and Sefer HaShorashim). Modern scholars agree that Yossiphon was probably written in Italy in the tenth century as a Hebrew adaptation and abridgement of the Jewish Roman historian Flavius Josephus (37 to 100), and Josephus himself mentions Yericho in connection with balsam trees (Antiquities of the Jews IV ch. 6 and XIV ch. 4, War of the Jews I ch. 6 and ch. 18) but says nothing about panag in Yechezkel meaning balsam oil.

  • Against it, Radak himself notes that if tzari is balsam oil then panag is unlikely to be, since Yechezkel lists them separately; Rabbi Yosef Teomim-Frankel (Iggros Pri Megadim letter 2) takes that as support for reading tzari as something else (Rashi's "theriaca").
  • Rabbi Moshe Tedeschi-Ashkenazi and Rabbi Shmuel David Luzzatto, in their commentaries to Yechezkel, tie panag to pinuk, pleasure or indulgence, by the interchange of gimmel and kuf; ironically, for all their opposition to Kabbalah, their reading can be corroborated from the Zohar (Bereishis 47b, 235b, 245b-246b), which likewise links panag to tafnukim.
  • Shoresh Yesha connects it to oneg, also pleasure or delicacy; Rabbi Klein presumes the reason is that ayin and peh are consecutive letters and so somehow interchangeable.
  • Dr. Zohar Amar of Bar Ilan University, in Tzimchei HaMikra, gathers a further list of explanations from the commentators: cassia, wax (making panag a synonym of donag), honeycomb, edible grass, rice, millet, some sort of pastry or baked good, a kind of wheat, and a place name (so that the pasuk would mean wheat from there).

Tzari (צרי), nataf (נטף), ketaf (קטף)

Tzari (also tzori at Yechezkel 27:17, tzri at Bereishis 37:25) appears six times in Tanach: Bereishis 37:25 and 43:11, Yirmiyahu 8:22, 46:11 and 51:8, Yechezkel 27:17. Some sort of scented potion used medicinally. Daas Mikra (to Divrei HaYamim I 1:32, among the names it relates to incense at the pasuk of Keturah) suggests that it is also possible that the name Tzeruyah, borne by David's sister, and the name Tzri (Divrei HaYamim I 25:3) derive from tzari. Rabbi Klein notes that the basic sense of צ-ר is a tight bundle of things. From it comes tzarah, distress, so called because one feels he has no options and cannot move this way or that, as though bound in place; from it too comes tzir, the pangs of childbirth; and from there tzari, a potion meant to soothe the pangs of tzir. It heads the ketores list at Kerisus 6a and Yerushalmi Yoma 4:5 and so entered the liturgy. Rambam (Hilchos Klei HaMikdash 2:4) renders it in Arabic al-balasan, balsam. Its name in the incense passage is nataf (Shemos 30:34), "the one that drips," which suits balsam, whose so-called oil is sap dripping from the tree; Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel, appended to the ketores teaching, says tzari is what drips (notef) from the ketaf tree, and Rambam's Mishnah commentary at Sheviis 7:6 glosses ketaf as the balsam tree. Targum Onkelos renders both tzari and nataf as ketaf; Rabbi Saadia Gaon and Rabbi Avraham Maimuni render nataf as al-balasan.

Whether Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel explains the earlier teaching or argues with it:

  • Rashi (to Shemos 30:34 and Kerisus 6a) reads him as explaining.
  • Ramban (there) reads Rambam as taking him to disagree, which would make tzari a piece of the tree itself rather than its oil (see Mahari Kurkus and Kesef Mishneh).

Bereishis Rabbah 91:11 identifies the tzari Yaakov sent to Mitzrayim (Bereishis 43:11) as balsam. That Rabbinic Hebrew word, like the English balsam, comes from the Greek balsamon and the Latin balsamum; the Oxford English Dictionary derives the English balm, an aromatic resinous substance, and balmy, mildly fragrant, from the same terms.

Bosem / besamim (בושם)

The general word, thirty occurrences, for fragrant goods: perfumes, spices, sweet-smelling things, not balsam in particular. It stands behind the names Basmas, borne by two of Esav's wives (Bereishis 26:34, 36:3) and by a daughter of Shlomo (Melachim I 4:15), and Yivsam (Divrei HaYamim I 7:2). It is widely held among linguists that the Greek balsamon derives from bosem itself, or at least from a cognate of bosem in another Semitic language (Arabic basham, Aramaic busma), as many other Greek plant names are of Semitic origin; the generic Hebrew word for sweet-smelling goods was seemingly borrowed by the Greeks for one particular sweet-smelling product, balsam oil.

  • Ramban (to Shemos 25:6 and 30:34) denies a root ב-ש-ם and reads bosem as a portmanteau of bo, in it, and sam/samim, potion or elixir.
  • Rabbi Shlomo Pappenheim similarly traces it to the biliteral ס-ם, putting a thing in its place, since such tonics and potions are commonly stored in specifically designated places (though the bet is usually treated as a radical in Pappenheim's system of roots).

Either way, when Chazal said one should become besumei on Purim (Megillah 7b), this seems to refer to intoxication from wine, the wine serving as the elixir that brings one to that state; others, including Rabbi Moshe ben Yekutiel of Rome (Sefer HaTadir) and Rabbi Yosef of Saragossa, a talmid of Rabbeinu Nissim of Gerona, explain it of drinking a quantity of scented (bosem) wine.

On how bosem became balsamon, there are three attempts.

  • Marcus Jastrow notes that an extra lamed was added to bosem to produce balsamon but does not explain where that consonant came from.
  • Dr. Richard C. Steiner of Yeshiva University accounts for it by arguing that the Hebrew and Semitic sin was originally pronounced in a way resembling an l sound, or was at least sometimes so perceived by Greeks, hence the ls in balsamon.
  • Others surmise that in some unknown early Semitic language bosem itself had a lamed before the sin.
  • Earlier, before the derivation from bosem became widely accepted, Rabbi Binyamin Mussafia (Mussaf HeAruch) speculated that Greek balsamon came from the Hebrew baal shemen, master of oil, presumably invoking the interchange of shin and sin.
  • Dr. Alexander Kohut (Aruch HaShalem) dismissed that on the ground that baal shemen appears nowhere else, and argued instead for the Hebrew boles, cutting, which occurs once in Tanach (Amos 7:14), together with shemen, oil.

Afarsemon (אפרסמון) and opopalsamun

Afarsemon (also afarsema) is the commonest Rabbinic word for balsam oil. It is absent from the Mishnah but appears with some frequency in Gemara: Jewish kings not anointed with the formal shemen hamishchah of the Torah (Shemos 30:22-33) were anointed with afarsemon oil (Horayos 11b-12a, Kerisus 5b, Yerushalmi Shekalim 6:1 and Sotah 8:3); a special berachah on it (Berachos 43a); its being highly flammable (Shabbos 26a); the Daughters of Tzion using it to entice men to sin (Shabbos 62b, Yoma 9b); its medical use (Shabbos 140a, Avodah Zarah 30a); and the dream in which Rabbi Elazar ben Pedas was shown that Hashem wishes to give him thirteen rivers of balsam oil as his reward in the World to Come (Taanis 25a, and see Yerushalmi Avodah Zarah 3:1). It appears in the Midrash too (Bereishis Rabbah 30:8, 61:2; Vayikra Rabbah 16:1; Eichah Rabbah 4:18). Rashi (to Amos 6:6) calls it the foremost sort of oil, so much so that an unspecified "oil" is sometimes read as afarsemon (Bava Basra 80b and Rosh HaShanah 23a on Yeshayahu 41:19; Rashi to Mishlei 27:9).

  • On where afarsemon itself comes from, scholars hold that the Rabbinic Hebrew balsam seems to have been borrowed straight from Greek, while the Talmudic afarsemon was borrowed from Old Persian, which took it from Greek: drop the initial aleph (often added to foreign words taken into Hebrew), swap the bet for a peh and the reish for a lamed, both interchangeable pairs, and afarsemon and balsam show as the same etymon.
  • Alternatively, afarsemon may have come into Persian directly from the Hebrew bosem, with bet for peh and an added reish.
  • Rabbi Yosef Teomim-Frankel roots the word instead in the Hebrew pirsum or mefursam, publicized, since balsam's good scent made it well known throughout the ancient world.

In Modern Hebrew afarsemon means persimmon, a neologism that does not reflect the Rabbinic word: persimmons were unknown in ancient times, having first been found in North America, and the English persimmon comes from the Algonquin pasimenan, dried fruit.

Opopalsamun is a third Rabbinic term, in Bereishis Rabbah 39:1 (Avraham likened to opopalsamun sealed in a container in the corner of a room, giving off no scent until someone moves it about, just as Avraham gave off nothing of his teaching while he stayed bottled up in Mesopotamia and spread it once Hashem sent him traveling) and 27:3 (its strong smell used to catch and identify a thief who had been breaking into houses at night). The word is most likely a loan from the Greek opobalsamum, flowing fragrant, and so is bound up in the end with balsamon as well.

Also discussed in

Radak on these roots

Sefer HaShorashim

ב-ש-ם

Spice. His entry gives no gloss, only the word's three vowel patterns and a plural formed from one of them.

Three patterns

וּקְנֵה־ בֹשֶׂם (Shemos 30:23), and cane of spice, and לֹא־בָא כַבֹּשֶׂם הַהוּא (Melachim I 10:10), there came none like that spice; a second pattern in וְקִנְּמָן־ בֶּשֶׂם מַֽחֲצִיתוֹ (Shemos 30:23), and cinnamon of spice, half as much; a third in אָרִיתִי מוֹרִי עִם־ בְּשָׂמִי (Shir HaShirim 5:1), I have gathered my myrrh with my spice.

The plural

The plural is בְּשָׂמִים רֹאשׁ (Shemos 30:23), chief spices, and it is formed from one of the three patterns. The account of their grammar is found in the section on the grammar of nouns.

וּקְנֵה־בֹשֶׂם (שמות ל, כג) לֹא־בָא כַבֹּשֶׂם הַהוּא (מלכים א' י, י), וְאֶת־הַבֹּשֶׂם וְאֶת־הַשָּׁמֶן (שמות לה, כח). ומשקל אחר וְקִנְּמָן־בֶּשֶׂם מַֽחֲצִיתוֹ (שמות ל, כג), בשש נקודות. ומשקל שלישי אָרִיתִי מוֹרִי עִם־בְּשָׂמִי (שיר השירים ה, א) והקבוץ בְּשָׂמִים רֹאשׁ (שמות ל, כג), והוא מקובץ מאחד מהשלשה המשקלים. ובאור דקדוקם תמצא בשער דקדוק השמות.

נ-ט-ף

Flowing and melting: hands dripping myrrh, mountains dripping sweet wine; by borrowing, speech that drops; neck pendants; and נָטָף, a spice said to be tzori.

What drips

וְיָדַי נָֽטְפוּ ־מוֹר (Shir HaShirim 5:5), my hands dripped myrrh, and יִטְּפוּ הֶֽהָרִים עָסִיס (Yoel 4:18), the mountains shall drip sweet wine. The noun is נִטְפֵי ־מָיִם (Iyov 36:27), drops of water. The sense of the whole is flowing and melting.

Speech that drops

By way of borrowing, of speech: וְעָלֵימוֹ תִּטֹּף מִלָּתִֽי (Iyov 29:22), and my word dropped upon them, like תִּזַּל כַּטַּל אִמְרָתִי (Devarim 32:2), my speech shall distil as the dew. The heavy form is of speech too: אַטִּף לְךָ לַיַּיִן וְלַשֵּׁכָר (Michah 2:11), I will preach to you of wine and strong drink. אַל־ תַּטִּפוּ יַטִּיפוּן (Michah 2:6), do not preach, they preach, means that Yisrael were preaching and saying to the true prophets, do not preach.

Pendants, and clear bdolach

הַנְּטִיפוֹת וְהַשֵּׁירוֹת (Yeshayahu 3:19), the pendants and the bracelets, and וְהַנְּטִפוֹת (Shoftim 8:26), and the pendants, are הענקים, neck ornaments; and they say that clear bdolach is called by this name in Arabic.

Nataf, said to be tzori

נָטָף וּשְׁחֵלֶת (Shemos 30:34), nataf and shecheles: they said the nataf is tzori, and it is called so because it drips from the ketaf trees, as Chazal say, tzori is nothing but the sap that drips from the ketaf trees (Kerisos 6a); balsamo in the vernacular. Some explain הַנְּטִיפוֹת וְהַשֵּׁירוֹת, the netifos and the bracelets, from this, the netifos being a vessel in which the tzori is put.

וְיָדַי נָֽטְפוּ־מוֹר (שיר השירים ה, ה), גַּם־שָׁמַיִם נָטָפוּ (שופטים ה, ד), נֹפֶת תִּטֹּפְנָה (משלי ה, ג) יִטְּפוּ הֶֽהָרִים עָסִיס (יואל ד, יח). והשם כִּי יְגָרַע נִטְפֵי־מָיִם (איוב לו, כז). והכבד [הִפְעִיל] וְהִטִּיפוּ הֶֽהָרִים עָסִיס (עמוס ט, יג). ענין הכל ההזלה וההתכה. ובדרך ההשאלה בענין הדבור וְעָלֵימוֹ תִּטֹּף מִלָּתִֽי (איוב כט, כב), כענין תִּזַּל כַּטַּל אִמְרָתִי (דברים לב, ב). והפעל הכבד [הִפְעִיל] אַטִּף לְךָ לַיַּיִן וְלַשֵּׁכָר (מיכה ב, יא), וְהַטֵּף אֶל־דָּרוֹם (יחזקאל כא, ב), והיה מַטִּיף הָעָם הַזֶּֽה (מיכה ב, יא) אַל־תַּטִּפוּ יַטִּיפוּן (מיכה ב, ו). פירוש הפסוק כי ישראל היו מטיפין ואומרים לנביאי האמת אל חטיפו. הַנְּטִיפוֹת וְהַשֵּׁירוֹת (ישעיה ג, יט), לְבַד מִן־הַשַּֽׂהֲרֹנִים וְהַנְּטִפוֹת (שופטים ח, כו), הם הענקים. ואומרים שקורין לבדולח הזך בערבי אל נט"ף. נָטָף וּשְׁחֵלֶת (שמות ל, לג), אמרו שהוא צרי ונקרא כן על שם שנוטף מעצי הקטף כמו שאמרו רבותינו ז"ל (כריתות ו, ע"א), צרי אינו אלא שרף הנוטף מעצי הקטף. בלסמ"ו בלע"ז. ויש מפרשים מזה הַנְּטִיפוֹת וְהַשֵּׁירוֹת כלי שמניחין בו הצרי.

פ-נ-ג

Pannag, named with wheat and honey: some say it is a place; the Targum renders it kulya, a field herb in Chazal's usage; and Yosef ben Gurion says it is balsam.

The one pasuk

בְּחִטֵּי מִנִּית וּפַנַּג וּדְבַשׁ (Yechezkel 27:17), with wheat of Minnis and pannag and honey. Some say pannag is the name of a place, and so is מִנִּית, Minnis.

The Targum: kulya

The Targum gives וְקוֹלְיָא, and kulya, and kulya in the words of Chazal is a herb among the field greens that are eaten, as they said (Eruvin 28b), מערבין בקוליא, an eruv may be made with kulya.

Yosef ben Gurion: balsam

Yosef ben Gurion said that pannag is balsam, and that it was found in Yericho. Yet the same pasuk says וצרי, and tzori, and the tzori is explained as the oil of afarsemon, which is what is called balsam.

בְּחִטֵּי מִנִּית וּפַנַּג וּדְבַשׁ (יחזקאל כז, יז), יש אומרים שהוא שם מקום וכן מִנִּית. והתרגום אומר וְקוֹלְיָא. וקוליא בדברי רבותינו ז"ל הוא עשב מירקות השדה הנאכלים שאמרו (עירובין כח, ע"ב) מערבין בקוליא. ויוסף בן גוריון אמר כי פנג הוא בלסמו, והיה נמצא ביריחו. והנה אמר בפסוק (שם) וצרי, והצרי מפרשים אותו שמן אפרסמון שהוא הנקרא בלסמ"ו.

צ-ר-יhe files it under צרה

Tzori, balm, which he takes to be the נטף among the spices of the ketores; Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel calls it sap that drips from the ketaf trees.

The balm of Gilad

מְעַט צֳרִי (Bereishis 43:11), a little balm, הַצֳרִי אֵין בְּגִלְעָד (Yirmiyahu 8:22), is there no balm in Gilad, and עֲלִי גִלְעָד וּקְחִי צֳרִי (Yirmiyahu 46:11), go up to Gilad and take balm.

Its three pointings

In וּדְבַשׁ וָשֶׁמֶן וָצֹרִי (Yechezkel 27:17), and honey and oil and balm, the vowel is a cholam; in the three above it is a chataf kamatz; and in וּצְרִי וָלֹט (Bereishis 37:25), balm and lot, it carries a sheva alone.

A spice of the ketores

Radak identifies it with the נטף, literally a drop, that the pasuk names among the spices of the ketores.

Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel

So too in the words of Chazal (Kerisos 6a), Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says הצרי אינו אלא שרף הנוטף מעצי הקטף, tzori is nothing but the sap that drips from the ketaf trees, which are scored so that the tzori comes out of them. It is the one called balsamo in la'az.

וּפַנַּג וּדְבַשׁ וָשֶׁמֶן וָצֹרִי (יחזקאל כז, יז), בחלם. מְעַט צֳרִי (בראשית מג, יא), הַצֳרִי אֵין בְּגִלְעָד (ירמיה ח, כב), עֲלִי גִלְעָד וּקְחִי צֳרִי (ירמיה מו, יא), בקמץ חטף. ובשוא לבדו וּצְרִי וָלֹט (בראשית לז, כה). והוא נטף שהזכיר הכתוב בסממני הקטרת. וכן בדברי רבותינו ז"ל (כריתות ו, ע"א), רבן שמעון בן גמליאל אומר הצרי אינו אלא שרף הנוטף מעצי הקטף, שרושמין בעץ ויוצא ממנו הצרי. והוא הנקרא בלסמ"ו בלע"ז.

ק-ט-ף

To cut off: the sense of them all is כריתה, cutting.

The whole entry

אֵת רֹאשׁ יְנִֽיקוֹתָיו קָטָף (Yechezkel 17:4), he cut off the top of its young shoots; וְקָֽטַפְתָּ מְלִילֹת (Devarim 23:26), and you may cut off ears of grain; מֵרֹאשׁ יֹֽנְקוֹתָיו רַךְ אֶקְטֹף (Yechezkel 17:22), from the top of its shoots I will cut off a tender one; and in the passive עֹדֶנּוּ בְאִבּוֹ לֹא יִקָּטֵף (Iyov 8:12), while it is still in its greenness it is not cut off. Of all of them: ענינם ענין כריתה, their sense is a sense of cutting.

אֵת רֹאשׁ יְנִֽיקוֹתָיו קָטָף (יחזקאל יז, ד), וְקָֽטַפְתָּ מְלִילֹת (דברים כג, כו), מֵרֹאשׁ יֹֽנְקוֹתָיו רַךְ אֶקְטֹף (יחזקאל יז, כב). והנפעל עֹדֶנּוּ בְאִבּוֹ לֹא יִקָּטֵף (איוב ח, יב). ענינם ענין כריתה.

Radak, Sefer HaShorashim, Berlin 1847. Public domain, digitised by Sefaria from the National Library of Israel.

Sources

Rabbi Reuven Chaim Klein, "Ki Sisa: Awesome Balsam," What's in a Word?, Ohr Somayach, 11 March 2023.

Rabbi Reuven Chaim Klein, "Awesome Balsam," What's in a Word? Synonyms in the Hebrew Language (book manuscript).

Cited in the essay: Yechezkel 27:17; Yossiphon I ch. 38; Rashi to Yechezkel 27:17, Melachim II 20:13, Yeshayahu 39:2, Berachos 43a, Amos 6:6, Mishlei 27:9; Radak to Yechezkel 27:17 and Sefer HaShorashim; Zohar, Bereishis 47b, 235b, 245b-246b; Bereishis 37:25 and 43:11 with Targum Onkelos, Yirmiyahu 8:22, 46:11, 51:8; Kerisus 6a and Yerushalmi Yoma 4:5; Rambam, Hilchos Klei HaMikdash 2:4 and his commentary to Sheviis 7:6; Shemos 25:6 and 30:34 with Rashi, Ramban, Rabbi Saadia Gaon and Rabbi Avraham Maimuni; Shemos 30:22-33; Bereishis Rabbah 91:11, 39:1, 27:3, 30:8, 61:2; Vayikra Rabbah 16:1; Eichah Rabbah 4:18; Megillah 7b; Horayos 11b-12a, Kerisus 5b, Yerushalmi Shekalim 6:1 and Sotah 8:3; Shabbos 26a, 62b, 140a; Yoma 9b; Avodah Zarah 30a and Yerushalmi Avodah Zarah 3:1; Taanis 25a; Bava Basra 80b and Rosh HaShanah 23a; Divrei HaYamim I 25:3; Amos 7:14; Bereishis 26:34, 36:3; Melachim I 4:15; Divrei HaYamim I 7:2; Dr. Zohar Amar, Tzimchei HaMikra; Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews IV ch. 6 and XIV ch. 4 and War of the Jews I ch. 6 and ch. 18; Marcus Jastrow; Dr. Richard C. Steiner; Rabbi Binyamin Mussafia, Mussaf HeAruch; Dr. Alexander Kohut, Aruch HaShalem; the Oxford English Dictionary; Daas Mikra to Divrei HaYamim I 1:32.